From /g/. If President of the US, what to do?

*Full audit of the Federal Reserve, and limit it's powers
*Bring back pre-1997 ban on prescription drug ads
*Get troops out of Japan and Europe
*Reinstate Glass-Steagall Act
*Decriminalize marijuana
*4 year terms for members of house
*Reform copyright laws to stop Disney and others from trying to
hold onto 80-year old cartoons
(25 year copyrights and 3 renewals.)
*Establish national standards for education, including programming

and science
*Put in a guest worker program
*Kill high speed rail initiative, money goes back to paying debts
*Create national medical schools
*End embargo on Cuba
*Stop steroid chasing in baseball
*Open up skilled worker visas
*Lower corporate tax to Germany's levels
*Cut subsidies to factory farms
*Cut subsidies to major oil companies
*Stop foreign aide to Israel
*Reform software patents
*Completely rebuild family courts
*Tax churches for land
*Greatly decrease prison terms for drug possession
*For those top earners, top 1%, they can name infrastructure projects built with their taxpayer dollars

>>10
My model does not call for «bigger» or «smaller», but «smarter».
I already explained that there are two forms of government possible. Limited, and unlimited. You can only choose one.

And you are choosing unlimited, since you abhor the limited form and like most people mistake the current level of government as simply requiring a few tweaks in order to function smoothly.

The limited government has only two real jobs, to enforce the law, and collect taxes to do that. When laws are themselves limited, then everyone can clearly understand the law, and arrange their lives around what that is. Today, with hundreds of thousands of pages of law in each sector, nobody really understands what's going on.

Small is not for the sake of small. Small is for the sake of sane organization. Small government can't take over society.