>>5
>2011
>Still using straw man (where did I use the word anarchy or pretend that libertarians don't want govt to enforce the law? Oh right I didn't)
>Either has no argument or is in actual fact mentally challenged
>>3
You may not want safety regulations since you have them already but I'm sure that if they were removed you would change your tune. Like having exits in every building? Fire alarms? Cars that don't topple over by design? Seat belts? Etc? To say you wouldn't want safety regulations is just absurd.
Using latin words also doesn't make your argument any more legitimate. The fact is that the government directly funded research for much of the technology we make use of today, including the internet. You're argument is essentially this : "Govt may have made the internet but anyone could have done that" which is false, the government has much more investment power than any single corporation and no corporation was funding on it's own similar technology, or in other words your argument is the assumption that the private sector would have done it anyways regardless of the fact that there is no evidence to suggest this.