>>35
Nobody made that correlation. It's just that some systems are shit when they're run for profit.
I agree. I have no problem with profit for other things that aren't directly related to a person's health. But when you have profit-run entities that directly affect people's well-being and survivability, people do things that they wouldn't normally do under a not-for-profit health care system.
People don't even have to be "money hungry" or "evil", it's an institutional problem that correlates with the fact that profit is the motive, and not being specifically aimed at looking out for the welfare of the public's health in and of itself.