Obama's past

FBI Agent On Obama's Communist Pal Bill Ayers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRg9il_V328

His terrorist organization, the Weather Underground, wanted to overthrow the federal government and place conservatives in "re-education camps." Those who refused to be indoctrinated would be killed. They estimated that 25 million conservative Americans would have to be slaughtered.

This is the man who launched Obama's political career with a fundraiser in his home.

Well if he's such a daring radical, he obviously failed miserably at it. The Puerto Rican Nationalist attacks (attempted assassination of Truman and the Capitol Building Attack) back in the 1950s were much, much more ballsy by comparison (they're still fucktards of course, both for the reasons why they done it and getting some of themselves killed).

Sigh, I hate radicals (both left and right), which is why if I do lean a certain direction politically, I make sure to stay close to center.

Dear OP,

"Obama is a communist/socialist/terrorist/muslim/etc is SO two years ago.

Evolve or kill yourself.

signed,
Humanity

>>3
so two years ago
Who cares? Obama flirted with communists right up to his election. When Ron Paul received donations from racists he instantly donated the same sum he received to a black college fund. What is Obama going to do for capitalism? Sack Bernanke?

Actually Obama was a Maoist. I seen a picture of Obama and Mao meeting in 1976 on freerepublic.

Didn't I see him with Robespierre?  That must make him a French revolutionist.

>>3
Ah liberals blatantly promoting their delusions and lies.
He was and is a fucking communist. His parents on both sides were fucking commies, he was mentored by communists, funded by communists, and so on.

>>2
>which is why if I do lean a certain direction politically, I make sure to stay close to center.
Ah liberals, so delusional. There is no such thing as "compromise" or "moderation" the founding fathers would spit on you for claiming to be "moderate".

>>5
>>6
HURR IS OBAMA A NAZI, MAOIST, FRENCH REVOLUTIONARY OR COMMUNIST MAKE YOUR MIND UP STUPID HICKS LOL
They are all genocidal leftists. Are you going to ignore a major similarity just because of a few minor dissimilarities? That would be bias.

Just as it is rational not to be a conservative it is rational not to be a leftist. Now that you have been informed of this do the logical thing, admit you were wrong, apologize and reject all forms of leftism, and remember, the negative emotions you are feeling which are stopping you from being reasonable are physical sensations not sound judgements.

>>5
In 1976 Obama was 15 years old, dipshit.

>>9
Old enough to bleed.  Old enough for communism!

His "pal" Bill Ayers?  Was this the same Bill Ayers that he might once have happened to have been in the same room as?  Just that holy shit I guess that means Rhys Ifans is my pal now.  Shame I had to lose the photo :(

>>11
Bill Ayers and Obama had a well established relationship and history together. Nice attempt to make a point, for a 4 year old.

Obama and Bill Ayers?  I can't decide whether I don't care or I don't care.

>>12
[citation needed]

Why do I get the feeling it's something silly and short-lived from decades ago?

>>14
The citation is OP's post, 'tard.
>>1

>>14
youtube.com/watch?v=tRg9il_V328

>Investigations by The New York Times, CNN, and other news organizations concluded that Obama does not have a close relationship with Ayers.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/us/politics/04ayers.html

>>1
>25 million conservative Americans would have to be slaughtered.
and nothing of value would be lost.

Bill Ayers played a central role in Obama's career and the political challenges of working his way up to becoming a viable democrat candidate, at which point Ayers, they worked closely together in the Chicago Annenberg Challenge and Woods Fund of Chicago, ostensibly charity organizations but most of the donations seem to go to already well off insitutions like Harvard college, if I were cynical I would say they were fronts for democrat machine politics in the region.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/us/politics/04ayers.html
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/apr/18/nation/na-radicals18

>>17
does not presently have a close relationship with Ayers
Ayers played a pivotal role in his indoctrination and entrance onto the political scene. He was a poster boy, like those starving black babies, and has always been.

>>17
Ayers discretely left Obama in 2002, obviously because he was afraid this would happen.

>>15
I notice that video mentions Obama precisely zero times.  Nice try, faggot.

>>7
founding fathers would spit on you for claiming to be "moderate".
That doesn't really apply these days when you've had men who fought against the largest empire known to man compared to douchebags who go after brown Muslims in turbans yelling Allah Ackbar (in this case it's almost as if the tables are turned).

Also, Bill Ayers is a washed up dickless who honestly never had a coherent thought in his life.

>>24
Like most leftists...

Ayers clearly had a relationship with both Obama and his wife. He had a hand in helping write his autobiography. He might have even wrote it himself.

Obama has surrounded himself with a lot of far left types that he later had to pretend he didn't know. He clearly doesn't have an aversion to rabid communists. However, Obama has always been a conformists and an empty suit for other people's ideas and ideology. Hope and Change was pretty vague for a reason.   

He's like a puppet with a 1000 different masters. It's a moot point now. Obama is Carter 2.0 + Bush 2.0 now.

>>23
They also fought against Muslims in the First Barbary War on the shores of Tripoli. Muslims started fucking with Americans and taking hostages for ransom. In March 1785, Thomas Jefferson John Adams tried to be reasonable with the Muslims and work it out. They mocked them and called them warmongers.

So Jefferson lobbied and helped pass the legislation that formed the Marines and sent them to kill brown Muslims in turbans yelling Allah Ackbar.

So ironically, your comparison of us and our founding fathers reflect a lack of understanding of the fact that even they understood that Muslims are retarded scum of the earth even back then.

Have a nice day sir...and you and your Islamic sex goat can go fuck off.

>>26
Ah yes, and the Treaty of Tripoli and all that jazz. However, back then there was an actual coherent reason why there was war with them and not this vague "War on Terror" bullshit that's going on now. So you can take that and fuck off!

>Ayers, Obama and Michelle
So you're saying they had a threesome?

>>27
No. It's all the same. Muslims are just retarded sand niggers in love with rape, terror and insanity. There will be 9\11s for decades to come until we start genociding them. It's hard to fight Muslims when they will do anything to get what they want while we are crippled by 'useful idiots' like you...assuming you aren't a durka in the first place.

I'm sorry if your ignorance of history made you look stupid. My apologies.

>>29
Ah, being deliberately obtuse. It's entertaining, if only for so long. The "War on Terror" bullshit includes such wonderful things like the Orwellian named Department of Homeland Security having them read everything you do at all times of the day, in the name of "fighting terrorism". Apparently, living in a police state, and having your constitution flushed down the toilet doesn't seem to bother you. No thanks, I'll pass.

I would think even you pig-headed far-rightwingers would be against having a police state (at least one that you're not in control of), but apparently, as another poster here said, it would seem that the far-right have abandoned any sort of principles and values they had long ago.

>>30
Terrorism is an effective political tool. If you want to pretend that Muslims don't employ these behaviors as part of their political or religious beliefs, I wouldn't dare shatter your worldview. You can't argue with fanatics with fantasies.

And if you feel a need to imply what other people believe in order to make your arguments sound better, then by all means you should do so. That is your nature. I do not advocate a police state, myself. I advocate that one should confront a problem rather than sweep it under the rug.

I'm not a far-rightwinger. That is just a word for the crutch you carry. The far right seems to believe in whatever you claim it does, so it goes without saying. It's easier to fight a strawman after all.

>>31
Terrorism is an effective political tool.
Obviously, and things employed to combat it are instead being used for nefarious reasons.
If you want to pretend that Muslims don't employ these behaviors as part of their political or religious beliefs, I wouldn't dare shatter your worldview.
I'm not arguing that. Islam is a disgusting religion, and every country that suffers under its bullshit borders on (if not fully) theocracy. Their behaviors are, of course, an extension of that.
And if you feel a need to imply what other people believe in order to make your arguments sound better, then by all means you should do so.
That's adorable.
I do not advocate a police state, myself.
You may not, yourself, but what you support does. It will continue to do so until people realize that mindlessly supporting the "War on Terror" will bring more bullshit like what the TSA has been pulling. Are you familiar with cause and effect?
I advocate that one should confront a problem rather than sweep it under the rug.
I agree, but the methods employed to combat this particular "problem" aren't doing anyone a favor. A lot of what is happening in the middle east is due to past US involvement (intelligence operations, military involvement, what have you), and continuing the same policies are going to make a group of absolutely insane people that much more insane, and the people who support such, slide even further up their collective ass.
I'm not a far-rightwinger.
You sure are espousing bullcrap like one.
The far right seems to believe in whatever you claim it does, so it goes without saying.
There's plenty of information on "the far-right". Anyone who can use Google will find plenty.
It's easier to fight a strawman after all.
Once again, adorable.

>Obviously, and things employed to combat it are instead being used for nefarious reasons.

Like self defense? Nothing is stopping Obama from leaving these nations. Libya? Hah.

>You may not, yourself, but what you support does. It will continue to do so until people realize that mindlessly supporting the "War on Terror"

Instinctive reflex is more like it. There is nothing wrong with defending yourself. Obama didn't have to continue Bush's policies. Obama isn't a big fan of liberty. This is a trend in most nations as of late.

>I agree, but the methods employed to combat this particular "problem" aren't doing anyone a favor. A lot of what is happening in the middle east is due to past US involvement

Simple bullshit mantra. You're playing the oldest blame game in the book. According to you, grown adults, suddenly, are no longer responsible for their own actions and behaviors the second you want to point a finger at something. Sand niggers were already fucked up. The Arab Spring was a sour joke.

>You sure are espousing bullcrap like one.

I'd be far right no matter what I said. I disagree with you, and therefore, I'm suddenly far-right. Like I said, I'm not going to be your strawman. Anyone who isn't a rabid communist is far-right I'd assume.

>>33
Like self defense? Nothing is stopping Obama from leaving these nations. Libya? Hah.
There's nothing wrong with "self-defense", but not being an adult about your seedy past involvement with other nations is not being responsible, or at the very least, it's recklessly moronic. Obama with Libya, on the other hand, is just more of the same. American propaganda wars.
Instinctive reflex is more like it.
It would be more accurate to say "knee-jerk reaction".
There is nothing wrong with defending yourself.
I agree.
Obama didn't have to continue Bush's policies.
Once again, completely agreed.
Obama isn't a big fan of liberty.
Neither was Bush.
This is a trend in most nations as of late.
Depending on where you live in the Western world, your mileage may vary.
Simple bullshit mantra. You're playing the oldest blame game in the book. According to you, grown adults, suddenly, are no longer responsible for their own actions and behaviors the second you want to point a finger at something.
It would appear that you're unfamiliar with the term "blowback". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blowback_%28intelligence%29 this not only applies to intelligence operations that go sour, but also military as well.
Sand niggers were already fucked up. The Arab Spring was a sour joke.
Be completely bigoted about Muslims all you want, the facts don't lie. The US isn't always an innocent party in middle east affairs (and I'm not saying the Muslims are, either), and people really need to stop pretending otherwise (especially when our own CIA admits this). I can't really comment on the Arab Spring, but I wouldn't be surprised if there's some CIA involvement in that as well. Hopefully, there's no major blowback from that (but being that this is 'Murika, I have my doubts).
I'd be far right no matter what I said. I disagree with you, and therefore, I'm suddenly far-right. Like I said, I'm not going to be your strawman. Anyone who isn't a rabid communist is far-right I'd assume.
You may not be far-right on the political scale, yourself, but you've adopted themes, and memes that are generally associated with the far-right. Apparently, in the US, anyone that leans center, or center-left is a "rabid communist". It's unfortunately an anachronistic knee-jerk reaction that is a living legacy from the McCarthy-era and the Second Red Scare.