Reading Anders Breivik's manifesto

I thought we could have a general political discussion while reading the Olso bomber/shooters 1500 manifesto in this thread.

The 2share manifesto download link was removed, so it was a bit hard to track it down. Hopefully we won't run out of mirrors.

I haven't read more than a few pages right now, but as I'm a LEFTIST anarchist/racist, I find myself disagreeing with the most basic rightwing concept:
What's so fucking special and holy about tradition and european identity? Defending things on the grounds that "it's the way it's always been" is just defending tradition against progress. It's not defending foreign immoralities, because then it would be just about those concrete things - it's defending stupidity in its purest sense. It would be like defending the NES for being "a traditional part of our country" against the Wii, to the point of wanting to ban the Wii.

>>38
>>Here are some specific sections he copied, replacing leftist with cultural marxist and black people with muslim.
>>Basically any part where his english is good and he sounds highly educated, its the Unabombers words, not his.

Thank you. It seems they had quite a few things in common.


>>Also his templar knight order was just 10 people meeting up in London and while he claims those people where important businessmen and politicians but judging by his delusions of grandeur I bet the people he met up with there are just as big nobodies as he is.

You're describing a typical templar knight order, except that I know for a fact that there's at least some upper class members too. Think of the templar knights as a non-violent secret fundamental christian mens club.


>>Killing teenagers at a youth camp in one of the most open countries in the world is hardly an achievement (there actually was a policeman present at the event for security, but he was unarmed, he got killed).
>>The only thing he has going for him is his fanatical devotion and thoroughness.

This devotion earned him a well deserved gold medal in the killing spree league, by killing THREE TIMES as many people as Cho managed to in the Virginia Tech massacre. He managed to assemble explosives within just a few days, with no previous chemistry experience. Appaling or not, in my eyes he's at least a genius.


>I'd say he is a crazy meglomaniac that thinks he is a freedom fighter figthing a 60 year old Marxist conspiracy.

No, he wasn't certainly not a megalomaniac. You're just mad. He certainly knew his limitations, and on occation had low self-esteem.
Yes, he is a freedom fighter, no matter what freedom he had defined, and yes, there really is a heavy moralfag corruption going on in western society, that he is shedding light on. His main enemy was not marxism, though, but islam, that would come and seize Europe once it had been rendered defenseless by marxism corruption.


>His perception of reality is "different" to use his lawyers words.

I agree with about 50% of what he's saying at this point. Especially the part about feminism.