Reading Anders Breivik's manifesto

I thought we could have a general political discussion while reading the Olso bomber/shooters 1500 manifesto in this thread.

The 2share manifesto download link was removed, so it was a bit hard to track it down. Hopefully we won't run out of mirrors.

I haven't read more than a few pages right now, but as I'm a LEFTIST anarchist/racist, I find myself disagreeing with the most basic rightwing concept:
What's so fucking special and holy about tradition and european identity? Defending things on the grounds that "it's the way it's always been" is just defending tradition against progress. It's not defending foreign immoralities, because then it would be just about those concrete things - it's defending stupidity in its purest sense. It would be like defending the NES for being "a traditional part of our country" against the Wii, to the point of wanting to ban the Wii.

>>5
>I'm against the inherent oppression of the state, so I'm an anarchist.
An anarchist is one who wants no state
>I'm against the inherent oppression of the upper class, so I'm leftist.
A leftist is against class division. I hope you mean the oppression BY the upper class.
>I'm against the inherent rapes and thefts of the africans, so I'm a racist.
This is the most ridiculous thing I've seen on newpol for a while. Race doesn't make someone a thief or a rapist, but this post probably makes me in to a fool for trying to reason with a racist - one who has already forgone reason for an easy solution with an us vs them mindset based on phony and discredited biology.