9/11 conspiracy (be polite please)

Hi.

My threads on /b/ about 9/11 go 404 really fast. So I decided I'll write here.

What do you think about 9/11 conspiracy?

Before you answer, please go to TPB, search for "Loose Change American Coup", download the documentary and watch it.

First I've seen first version of this film in 2007. Then I've seen 2nd and 3rd edition (American Coup). I think I'm sane. But after the facts (the facts that was even broadcasted on that day, the facts that everybody can search on internet) about conspiracy are much more accurate than those served by news.

Also if you dig into NIST investigation, you'll find that it intentionally omit facts/witnesses (like Barry Jennings who was in WTC7 before it collapsed and was captured by news when he got out from WTC7 on 9/11). This year they released final report on 9/11. They claim they can't explain fall of WTC7 but they also note that they didn't considered bombs (Barry said he heard bombs all the time).

I think I'm one of 1000000 who believe this. What do you think?

I tend to not believe in the conspiracy because it would be difficult to impossible to pull off.

*  I actually did some maths on the amount of time needed to plant the bombs -- I got something like 10 people could do it in 8 hours.  It's a long time to have people in a building, especially considering the survailance and cleaning people who are in most office buildings overnight.  No one has come forward with reports of strange people in the building.

*  Related -- most explosive demolitions require that that bombs be placed directly on the supports (and in some cases the supports themselves must be cut.  I seems absurd to suggest people ripping out walls and cutting steel beams and leaving zero evidence of their presence.  Sooner or later someone will notice the holes in the drywall.  No one reported holes in the drywall, metal shavings or anything else inside the building.

*  The sheer number of people required to make the event come off and keep it a secret is simply staggering.
  * per loose change, the flights were switched at some point.  This would require two sets of flight crew being aware of the plan *per plane*.  Assuming an average flight crew of 3 (pilot, copilot, navigator) that's twelve people.  Then you need the ground crew at whatever airport they use to land the planes, as well as the tower crew to clear the takeoffs/landings.  Additionally, you need to cooperation of the passengers or a place to dump their bodies.
  * the people involved in planning and coordinating such a plan.  9/11 conspiracies are fairly complex, which probably means a good number of planning staff, their personal staffs, and so on.  Budgets must be made, materials must be found or bought and people hired to do their bit. 
  *  the people carrying out that event.  once all the planning is done, you must find people to do their parts in the plan.  Bomb planters, maybe fake cleaning crews to keep the real cleaning crews out, stuff like that.  Pilots, copilots, navigators, flight control officers, and their support. 
Conservatively, I think that at least 100 people would have to be in on the conspiracy.  But then you have to keep not only them but thier cohorts silent.  If someone writes and publishes a tell all book or blabbs to the media, it's game over.  But having hundreds of people disappear is going to raise questions as well.  Yet there are no people coming forward saying that they participated in the largest attack on American soil.  Surely someone feels remorse for killing civilians.  But no one has ever come forward. not the bomb planters, not the suriving flight crews, no one at the airbase, no one.  It seems implausible that 100 people could know that they are personally responsible and not only do their job perfectly, but not feel remorse enough to say something to someone.

The much much simpler way to do this is to have the terrorists attack the towers.