9/11 conspiracy (be polite please)

Hi.

My threads on /b/ about 9/11 go 404 really fast. So I decided I'll write here.

What do you think about 9/11 conspiracy?

Before you answer, please go to TPB, search for "Loose Change American Coup", download the documentary and watch it.

First I've seen first version of this film in 2007. Then I've seen 2nd and 3rd edition (American Coup). I think I'm sane. But after the facts (the facts that was even broadcasted on that day, the facts that everybody can search on internet) about conspiracy are much more accurate than those served by news.

Also if you dig into NIST investigation, you'll find that it intentionally omit facts/witnesses (like Barry Jennings who was in WTC7 before it collapsed and was captured by news when he got out from WTC7 on 9/11). This year they released final report on 9/11. They claim they can't explain fall of WTC7 but they also note that they didn't considered bombs (Barry said he heard bombs all the time).

I think I'm one of 1000000 who believe this. What do you think?

>>26

No offense. I admit I didn't dig enough into both sides.

The conspiracy side is easy to understand but it mostly presents comparisons to other events while official side is long NIST (=boring) research papers (finished after 10 years). They're probably some scientists who acknowledge it. But there are also scientists on conspiracy side. How can you tell which are good or bad? I bet those papers are made so long and so boring intentionally.