>>25
>>26
Well, maybe not specifically "libertarian principles" but something like it.
1: Technology is driven mainly by 1000s of little technical developments, the big breakthroughs are important but are often dependent on many other technologies to turn them from theory into practice and then to find economical applications for the breakthrough.
2: Even after inventing something continuous development is needed to maximize it's effectiveness and to get it to work in many different applications and under different economic conditions.
3: A pro-active approach is needed, not a top-down approach, you need industries that are continually looking for ways to improve efficiency and continually looking for possible uses for their products, central planning results in sectors of the economy that could benefit from each other being isolated by bureaucracy.
With this in mind it should be obvious why economic freedom is a major factor in making the most out of technology. Most renewable energy would survive without state subsidies, hydroelectric power for instance is a big one, also many minor applications for windmills and solar power in regions where market and environmental conditions favor them, most farms still use windmills for irrigation purposes.
>>28
>>32
Human co-operation is the future.
So if you snap your fingers and say "we're all anarchists now" it will create a utopia? You have to see the problems with statements such as these, you're leaving quite a lot unanswered, you may need to brush up on your argument.
What would a day in the life of Joe Anarchist 100 years from now be like? Before you answer remember that no one (no one logical anyway) is interested in what anarchism is not, we all know anarchism is "no state", "no capitalism" and "no mean people", the only thing that is relevant is the practical side of things.