it's that time again

your sociopolitical position(s), as briefly as you can.

>>192 I dont think so. Most likely the majority of post here are done by bots and scripts.

Anonbot here

http://mantasreview.blogspot.com/

Anti Statist
Market Anarchist

Pretty much any society whether "left" or "right" as long as they are "anti state" and are tolerant of other societies.

>>204
Correction
"tolerant of other ANTI STATE societies."

>>204-205
Don't you have more shitty videos to make and upload on YouTube?

>>206
So "shitty" you cant make a video response showing how "shitty" they are?

Anti statistm = philosophy of fools

philosopher kings wear no clothes.

anti-statism is as stupid as statism

>>208
Whats Anti Statistm?

>>210
wut
i guess to you
Atheism is as stupid as theism too huh?

>>202
Botfag here

>40 and the people that do tend those fields will be pissed the fuck off when some schmuck takes an apple they worked hard for. Socialism doesnt work, Never has never, never will. " ...the problem with socialism is eventuly you'll run out of other people's money" -margerette thatcher

>>214
Thatcher
I'd take the advice of a Tory with a grain of salt.

>>21
ignoring criticism because it's from an opponent
The irony is by following marxist rhetoric to the letter and ignoring anything contrary to it socialists deny themselves the ability to develop the institutions and political culture to make socialism a reality.

>>216
Do you actually read the bullshit you type before posting? I can't even tell if these kinds of posts are genuine, or parodies (since you quote properly). I'm gonna have to call Poe's Law on this one.

>>216
The Word. You speak it well, brother. Socialism works great on paper.

Politics.  A strange game.  The only winning move is not to play.

>>217 it's quotebots.. nothing else.. Ive said it before...

>>217
You forgot to point out what was so horribly wrong with my post, your post amounts to "you're dumb", which is a meaningless statement over the internet. I'm going to assume you couldn't explain what was wrong because you didn't understand my argument, let me break it down for you.

1: All criticism comes from opponents so if you ignore criticism just because it comes from opponents you will be ignoring all or most criticism.

2: You are not right about everything or the best at everything, so in order to improve your understanding of something you must be able to respond to criticism.

1+2: When socialists ignore opponents, especially an esteemed stateswoman like Margaret Thatcher, they are stifling their own progress.

>>218
The thing is I am actually doing them a favor by providing constructive criticism, maybe I should be more straight to the point though.

>>220
Oh yeah, quotebots, they're everywhere.

>>221
You forgot to point out what was so horribly wrong with my post
The so-called "socialists" that you're criticizing don't follow Marxist theory since when it comes under intense scrutiny is incredibly pseudo-scientific. It's like thinking that homeopathy is going to cure the stage 3 cancer in your body. No Marxist would like to admit it, but Marx just took what French Revolution-era thinkers were already espousing a century earlier, and twisted it slightly for his own. This had the unfortunate effect of making his theory alone incredibly popular, and had the indirect result of one bloody regime after another being forcefully installed (some of which parts of the world are still suffering from). Having said that, things like class struggle and income inequality do exist even when viewed from a non-Marxist perspective (which is a perspective that sane people take).

Margaret Thatcher
She is one of a long line of Tories that over centuries helped make the UK the shithole it is today when compared to its continental neighbors (though, I have to say, it's still quite a livable shithole when compared to the US, so it hasn't quite reached that low, yet).

>>222
lol, tories are the bad guys? Labour want to import turks and pakis to replace the english, but those goddamn tories!

>>223
All three major political parties in the UK: Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrats aren't for restricting immigration. Say hello to your buddies at Stormfront for me.

>>35
anarchism's peaceful implementation depends on sustainable living and localized government. your rants about free market capitalism and socialism are irrelevant given the most effective implementation of anarchist principles on an actual society. during the spanish civil war, villages formed these little anarchist communes and lived happy productive lives until the luftwaffe began using them as target practice.

>>222
It's not just socialists or marxists, it is all radicals whose ideology can be summed up as attempting to redefine collectivism instead of accept it for what it is and come to peace with it, yet
>>215
had to ignore criticism, not just any old criticism from any old batshit insane wingnut but Margaret Thatcher herself. This is way out of the "grey area" for what it is reasonable to ignore due to impracticalities, there is no excuse for it.

I'll take Margaret Thatcher's battle against the miners as an example, the miners wanted everyone to pay tax to subsidize an industry that was no longer economical on such a scale, she put an end to this, when she was prime minister anything was possible, she is a saint among mortal women, an angel so pure the heavens couldn't hold her and she changed the world. If they had listened, if they had accepted they were wrong and realised maybe capitalism isn't the anathema they make it out to be they would have certainly stolen votes from the conservative party and maybe things wouldn't be so bad today.

>>226
I see why they call "Thatcherism" a religion. To put a simple Tory on a pedestal and worship is either very dangerous, or highly deranged. Perhaps both.

>>227
Right.  Anyone who disagrees with you is "deranged."  Perhaps he belongs in a camp, or an a State psychiatric hospital where he can be "helped," eh Comrade?

>>228
maybe you just don't like being told you're a moron?

>>229
Cry more.  Your tears are delicious.  Now, how is >>226 "deranged," again?  You can make this diagnosis over the Internet now, you know.  It's all in the DSM-IV-R.

>>227
I'm just stating facts. It just so happens that Thatcher is all that. Just admit you were wrong and come to peace with it, that's all I'm saying.

Thatcher was a decent leader.

If by decent, you mean "shit", then sure.

since there is NOTHING wrong with >>2, and since it is the most superior and unassuming position, the only reason to disagree with that sociopolitical position is national arrogance. Yes, i'm serious.

So basically, >>2, and - /thread

>>232
Margaret Thatcher was a fucking cunt.

>>235
You only think that because your mother was a whore that never loved you they way your uncle did.

>>236
ok well this thread has degenerated to shit.

glad everyone on this board could get together to at least discuss this shittttttt

>>237
Margaret Thatcher was a fucking cunt.
You're just as guilty as 238.

>>238 please see >>239 for a recursive comment...

>>238 please see >>239 for a recursive comment...