Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Ron Paul 2012

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-27 16:02

Ron Paul has officially announced that he's going to take part in the 2012 election race.

Anyone else gonna vote for him?

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-27 16:33

I'm pretty sure no one is going to vote for him. Same as every other election.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-27 16:36

No, he's got shit for brains.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-27 19:11

I'm voting for him because I'm not a control freak that wants to rule other people's lives.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-27 19:16

sauce needed

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-28 11:26

>>4

Except when it comes to abortion

amirite?

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-28 12:57

>>6
http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/abortion/

He believes first trimester abortions are fine, he's not a fundamentalist whackjob, just someone who leans towards pro-life but stays well within the gray area between pro-life and pro-choice. It would be like me saying you are pro-life because you think third trimester abortions should be illegal. Your opinion is not your own, you read one of many smear campaigns against him and believed everything. I've done this before and it took me a while to admit I was the victim of a confidence trickster but later I feel proud for being able to realize how little I know which is the first step in being able to find the truth beyond what society tells you.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-28 14:17

I'm not voting for him because he's a control freak that wants to ruin the economy and make everyone bow to our rich libertarian masters.

Keep your gold i'll keep my money thanks mr communist

Name: RedCream 2011-04-28 23:29

>>8
The rich masters are hardly Libertarian.  They are essentially Socialist, and largely make their massive incomes from controlling the government.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-28 23:38

>>9

Well, they might be socialists when it comes to policy that benefits them, but they are "Libertarians" with regards to everyone else. The rich masters are simply that, rich masters. They support anything that makes them richer.

*And by libertarians I mean the distorted conception of libertarianism that is used in the US.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-29 1:21

>>7

You understand there is a huge difference in development between the 1st and 3rd trimester..

Name: RedCream 2011-04-29 14:39

>>10
Then call them what they really are, not what they claim to be.

Therefore they are not "Libertarians".  They are Corporate Socialists.

Call them that, and we can move forward with this discussion.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-29 20:00

>>12
We have a better word that's in use.  It's called Fascism

Name: RedCream 2011-04-29 20:45

>>13
Then use it, instead of pretending that real Libertarians are some threat to you.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-29 22:06

>>14

You do realize that libertarianism has classically meant social anarchism, right? Not the individualist horse shit that people commonly think is Libertarian. What do you consider a "real Libertarian" to be?

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-30 1:38

>>12
Corporate socialists? How in the slightest, the whole concept of "corporations" is a fiction invented by statists and government. Modern corporations in the USA exist on political pandering and corruption.

Liberal fallacies and lies and deceptions so permeate modern society that it's almost impossible to see reality. The USA is rapidly turning into a third world shithole, run by communist jews.

Name: RedCream 2011-04-30 5:03

>>15
What do you consider a "real Libertarian" to be?
One who understands that with less government, you have more liberty.

Name: RedCream 2011-04-30 5:05

>>16
The problem today is that using their control of government, they no longer have to bear any of the costs of doing business.  The taxpayers pick all that up now.

That is what is different today, hence "corporate socialism".

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-01 3:28

>>18

You are seriously misinformed.

Paul opposes corporate welfare (i.e, special tax breaks for certain companies, subsidies.)

Most importantly he opposes the corporatism of the wars. Ever hear of the military industrial complex?

No doubt you were educated in our illustrious public school system to be that misguided. Dang son. Get off the internet and go read a book or something.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-13 16:21

Well at least now it's official... but he will more than likely be Trump'ed by Gingrich.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-14 2:09

>Paul opposes corporate welfare (i.e, special tax breaks for certain companies, subsidies.)

RP opposed killing OBL. That makes him worse than a nigger.

Joke candidate 2012!

Name: DEAL WITH IT 2011-05-14 12:21

OBAMA FOUND OSAMA

OBAMA IS GUARANTEED ANOTHER TERM

THERE IS NO POINT IN DISCUSSING ANY OTHER CANDIDATE

/ALL 2012 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION THREADS

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-14 15:10

>>22
Obama didn't find Osama.
Never trust a presidential canidate fishing for votes.
Would they have actually found Osama, they wouldn't have been in such a hurry to get rid of the body.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-15 22:14

>>19

The same public school system that Paul would like to give control of to state and local governments, which can then teach creationism and write Thomas Jefferson and the Civil Rights Movement out of history.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-16 6:33

>>24
Ironically, a Federal education advisory board suggested that a more effective means of teaching American history might be to ignore or speed through events prior to the 1860s.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 15:17

>>24
>and the Civil Rights Movement

The largest moment when america started turning to shit? There was no "movement", you have jewish organizations encouraging violence among the negros, and jewish judges revising the constitution.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 16:49

>>26
>jewish organizations encouraging violence among the negros

[citation needed]

>jewish judges revising the constitution.

If protestants didn't have such a poor aptitude for legal work then perhaps you wouldn't be stuck with catholics and jews manning the bench?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 17:47

[sup]Fire up the furnaces.[/sub]


































We have a genocide to conduct.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 17:48

Fire up the furnaces.

there we go

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 22:09

>>27
>[citation needed]
NAACP
>If protestants didn't have such a poor aptitude for legal work then perhaps you wouldn't be stuck with catholics and jews manning the bench?
Yes because all the centuries before weren't protestants? Obviously the fact prestigious law schools are 40%+ jewish is because jews are rly smart and nothing to do with a jewish conspiracy to promote other jews at the expense of gentiles.

Jews stick together against whites.
Jews have an instinctive hatred of everything white, christian.
That's simply how the world works, people are born into or join groups, groups trump the individual. Currently american government is run by a group called the jews.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-18 22:42

>>30
>NAACP

elaborate

>bawww, jewsih conspiracy

[citation needed]
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -