Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

The US ADMITS provoking Libyan war

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-31 4:53

According to Washington CIA agents was sent into the country weeks ago to support rebel groups.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-31 5:22

How did they provoke a war this time? Libyans wanted freedom. Gaddafi told them to piss off. They Started a rebel uprising. War against the Gaddafi regime.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-31 5:35

>>2
The way that CIA have always done: Organize democratic protests and then escalate things from there, like in Pigs Bay.

In this case some faggot groups didn't like Gaddafi or his politics for some reason, so the CIA united them all under the notion that the US "democracy" was much better than Gaddafi rule, and organized "protest rallies" to cause chaos and provokation.

Gaddafi naturally went "Fuck off, this is my peaceful country, and if you don't like it, you faggot dissidents are free to leave, and take your CIA invasion force with you. Also keep in mind that I'm not above shooting criminals if I'm forced to, in order to ensure the stability of my country.".

Then the CIA helped the faggots to become terrorists by scouting bomb targets for them and providing them with hyperactive Pokémons.

In the end I guess that this is payback for Gaddafi not cooperating with the US, and an excuse to have more US troops on the border to Europe.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-31 10:41

>>3
What? Gadaffi's fucking batshit insane. A peaceful country doesn't thrive one his kind. The "Faggot" groups were in the right to declare they're tired of his shit.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-31 12:19

>>4
>batshit insane
That just about covers it!

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-31 14:02

>>4
Regardless >>2 is right to be paranoid, the airstrikes in Libya were not hastily prepared, they were very well organized like a pre-planned offensive, not just logistically but politically and diplomatically, they laid the no-fly zone on the table as though they weren't bothered, then at a critical moment when the rebels were fighting what would have been their last major battle before defeat was inevitable they managed to gain the diplomatic capital to authorizn a no-fly zone, very quickly NATO took over the opreation and milked it for all it was worth simultaneously striking a large number of targets that had probably been tracked by spy satellites, planes and possibly directed by the rebels themselves, perhaps also meticulous observation by intelligence services for years prior.

Retarded paranoid faggots like >>2 are an embaressment but you're a sucker if you aren't cynical in politics.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-31 17:47

>>6
it's also remarkable how they ignored rwanda and darfour and now all of a sudden they're power rangers fighting for the better of the people in libya. i never believed this "uprising shit", in fact... i think trying to take down your government is just about the dumbest thing you can do at this point in time.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 0:08

>>7
They weren't taking down the government, they were trying to replace one government with another. I consider the actions to be politically motivated and Libya's economic importance is more of a force multiplier than a causal factor, Libya would sell their oil whoever won, the evil plutocracy who run rich 1st world countries just prefered to buy the oil from a corrupt democracy instead of a destabilizing tyrant.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 12:15

>>4
You mean those Jewish-funded faggot groups that number less than 10,000 people and don't represent the Libyan population?

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List