If you think about it anarcho-capitalism is more anarchist than anarcho-communism/socialism. Any forced distribution of wealth is unnecessary coercion, which negates the whole anarchy thing. A society that doesn't let you keep earned profits cannot be anarchist. A state can force people, where a a company cannot, unless is is given power by the state. In an anarcho-capitalist society, assuming all transactions are mutual and not forced, there would be nothing wrong with private property and wealth.A man's property is his own, unless he physically steals it, so forced redistribution/ conversion to public property would be more authoritarian than the government you just got rid of.