>>10
What would a realist-anarchism be then? One which takes into account that any cooperation between individuals will result in corruption? Imagine this in the form of a math equation.
C=corruption
S=stresses, different economic, political, cultural and religious factors increase the stress and make people more likely to flip out
P=population, the more people the more administration is needed and the more loopholes for corruption
K=corruption constant for a method of organization
M=the mutual benefit gained from an organization
N=net benefit
C=SPK
M-C=T
Increase S, P or K and you increase corruption, M is all very well but if it is exceeded by corruption then it is ultimately not good for people.
Regular systems of anarchy have very high M but also very high K, you propose decreasing S and P to decrease C but never K. You need an anarchy that can work in a society that needs some form of hierarchical administration and is naturally corrupt divided and hateful.