Annex Canada and Mexico

So resource depletion and overpopulation will see the end of liberal democracy and a return to fascist/socialist authoritarian regimes conducting wars of aggressive territorial expansionism. We need to get ahead of the curve for the greater good and we have the best advantage now while the element of suprise still exists and resources are plentiful, they don't have nukes and UK, France, Russia and China secretly wouldn't start a nuclear war over this even though they might threaten to. The only problem would be the insurgency after the conquest which is difficult to defeat for 2 reasons.

1: They are supplied by organized criminals or foreign powers.
We can solve this problem with a naval blockade and a wall.

2: We are afraid to kill the civilians they hide among.
Ghengis Khan never had this problem, we should follow in his example.

Thoughts? Suggestions?

>>11
You don't seem to grasp some very simple concepts:

Wars are destructive for the poeples of both the victor and the looser.

Resource depletion is a matter of choice. It doesm't have to happen. So is the destruction of our natural habitat.

In both cases above, one thing in common that is cristal clear: that the ultra rich and powerfull will become richer and everyone else, regardless of nationality, religion etc., will lose out of this.

Therefore, unless you are a rackafeller or a rothschild, you would have to face terrible concequences from the policy you are suggesting. As I told you before, it would be realy nice to see the US shoot itself on the foot like this because you come out as so self centered andidiotic really, but honestly, I would feel bad for the average american(and mexican and canadian) that would have to die or starve. Face it, your theory is missing the big picture.