Seriously, how can anyone put a nigger beside a human and say they are the same species. Such action does not exist anywhere in the animal kingdom. It's about time people get their heads out of their asses and admit the truth... niggers are some dead end branch of hominids that are infused with evil intent, a violent nature, gibs-me-dat and a brain that can't mature past muh-dick or muh-poosie
The major subdivision of a genus or subgenus, regarded as the basic category of biological classification, composed of related individuals that resemble one another, are able to breed among themselves, but are not able to breed with members of another species.
They are a different breed, but the same species.
Name:
Anonymous2011-02-11 14:00
>>7 but are not able to breed with members of another species
Explains wolves/coyotes, rainbow trout/cutthroat trout, horses/donkeys, etc.
>>1 a) you are bumb as fuck
b) you are a racist cunt
c) you can't judge a species by its looks. There are species where the male looks totaly different than the female
And I'm not making the distinction between niggers and humans based solely on looks. According to accepted science, homo sapiens fully evolved in Africa 200,000 years ago. 100,000 years ago, a small group of Africans headed north. This small group inhabited the rest of the world. This group was already unique, in that it alone had the intrepidity and determination tovspread out and conquer the world. That group, which became the Caucosoid and Mongoloid races, has been evolving under extremely different, more challenging environments for the last 100,000 years. 100,000 years is quite long in biologic time. For example, domestic dogs branched off from wolves 15,000 to 100,000 years ago.
Blacks are unique in that they never developed a written language, the wheel, architectural works or anything that would indicate they live a human existence. Literature, palaces, cities, they existed everywhere from the Incas to the Indians, Persisns, Chinese, Druids, Malays, Romans, but not in black Africa. For the past 100,000 years, non-blacks have been developing technology and advancing knowledge. Blacks, meanwhile stayed nearly naked, technology-less, with no domesticated animals, no written language, no wheel, no stone buildings, no metalworking, nothing.
Name:
Anonymous2011-02-11 19:44
Look at religion. Virtually every non-black group came up with an admirable religion or philosophy which was recorded and taught to a priesthood. Indians had the Vedas and Upanishads, Chinese had Confucianism and Daoism. Europeans had Virgil, Horace and Homer to write down their pagan religion, with Plato, Aristotle and countless others to record their philosophy. Babylonians had the epic of Gilgamesh, Egyptians had the Book of the Dead, even the Aztecs had a corpus of literature (which was unfortunately destroyed by the Spanish invaders. Only Blacks hadn't recorded or created any official religion or philosophy. Until non-white intervention, blacks relied on voodoo, witchcraft, black magic, and animism with no pantheon of gods, no priesthood, or anything that could develop them past superstition and barbarism.
It is questionable what Blacks could achieve on their own. All current black civilization is in fact transplanted non-black civilization. No blacks have won any Nobel prizes in the hard sciences or gotten any spot on a list of Human Accomplishment that would represent some major scientific or technological advancement for the world.
And you can't blame this on geography. Blacks in western Europe and North America are given preferential treatment and access to college educations, and yet they still produce nothing. At the same time, non-blacks have made South Africa, Zimbabwe and Egypt into decent, first-world nations without a problem.
You can't blame bad luck or isolation, either. Blacks have been connected to the outside world since the 1400s. They have had centuries to improve themselves with full access to modern knowledge and technology. In contrast, it took Japan twenty years to go from a feudal samurai culture to one that defeated Russia in 1900. Germany recovered from WWII in just ten years, becoming a prosperous, powerful, leading-edge modern civilization. Africans, meanwhile cannot recover from "colonization", "slavery", or "discrimination" after centuries. Haiti has been an all-black, independent, free state for 200 years. Even so, its lifestyle and standard of living perfectly matches that of black Africa. They haven't progressed an inch. Their neighbors the Dominican Republic, meanwhile, has a working government that takes care of their people and doesn't need charity. The difference? Their population is non-black.
Name:
Anonymous2011-02-12 11:15
BAWWWWWWWWWW. Call me "racist" some more. Your tears are delicious.
A "racist" is someone who says things everyone in the room knows to be true, but everyone else is too afraid and too brainwashed by the televitz to say out loud.
"Racists" are speaking truth to power, and they are the bravest people in our society today.
Name:
Anonymous2011-02-12 20:37
Why just make shit up? Why not actually learn about anthropology? Or is is something that does not truly interest you and you just like to say ignorant things to get a rise out of people?
If you want to know why blacks had a different civilization then other people, go to the library and figure it out. I am guessing that you could pretty much benefit from picking up ANY book you see and reading it. I hope that I am mistaken, and you are not actually so lazy in other aspects of your education.
I'll even throw you a bone for a good palce to start since you apparently have not given this more then a second of consideration: begin with "domesticable flora & fauna".
You can probably even find something with pictures if that helps you.
Name:
Anonymous2011-02-12 21:33
>>13
So why do blacks continue to fail in the US and Britain when they are given more access to college than any other race? Why is the African-American's murder rate exponentially higher than that of all other races? Why is Haiti (majority blacks) a shithole and the Dominican Republic (majority non-black) not, when they have similar histories of colonization and independence?
It's all because they had no cows to domesticate in Africa? Ok, I don't blame them, but it's an insult to call them human.
but it's an insult to call them human.
And how exactly does labeling them as inhuman help the situation?
Name:
Anonymous2011-02-13 5:33
>>14
It's a matter of opportunities. Black people in the US HAVE TO FACE RACIST TWATS like you everyday. If you marginalize any part of the community you are bound to measure more criminality in that part. >>13 was absolutely right to tell you that you need proper anthropological study to look into these things. Now if you want to be naive, you have every right to. You will even find many people who are also racist and naive and will agree with you. But this has nothing to do with facts or reality.
Antifa is what is expecting you if you try to practice what you preach.
Look it up...
If blacks are less than human, racists are less than blacks.
Name:
Anonymous2011-02-13 7:10
>>16
The Irish and Italians had to face racist twats when they came to America. The Chinese had to face racist twats when they came to America. Every ethnic group here (besides some western Europeans) had to face racist twats and many of them still do, but do they get affirmative action? Do they get easier access to college and scholarships? No. And they still manage to be more successful and commit far fewer crimes than blacks.
Name:
Anonymous2011-02-13 10:43
Wait, I'm not american so i'm not sure about what you mean. Are you saying that black people have special priviledges towards education?? Is the state encouraging tham more to college?
If so that's a racial distinction.
Name:
Anonymous2011-02-13 14:26
>>17
You sir are obviously RACIST, because you brought up facts that certain people don't want to hear. Facts are like kryptonite to them.
>>17
Were any of those groups ever forced into slavery by Americans? Also, blacks look completely different than whites which makes it easier for small-minded, pathetic worms such as you to dehumanize them.
Name:
Anonymous2011-02-15 5:27
>>20
You can't explain anything to a person that has his ears closed and his mind blocked. >>17 is obviously here to say his own thing and not to listen and share opinious. I'm afraid we're wasting our time with this guy.
Name:
Anonymous2011-02-15 6:28
>>20-21
Well, you can call me what you want but you're claiming that blacks flunk out of college and murder each other because their great great great grandparents were slaves, that's just ridiculous. And Asians look completely different, too, they do fine. What the Chinese went through on the west coast and on the railroads was almost as bad as black slavery, too.
because their great great great grandparents were slaves, that's just ridiculous.
No, it isn't. The effects of slavery have lasted for generations. Just look at how they were treated before the civil rights movement. Were any of those other groups you mentioned subject to that so recently? Sure, Japanese internment comes to mind but blacks have had it worse and for a much longer time in American history.
You can't explain anything to a person that has his ears closed and his mind blocked.
Yes, please enlighten me with your wisdom. Because I've never heard any of these facts before. Either that or I've just willfully shut them out. If you can't honestly answer >>15 though, I'm through with you.
The racists claiming other races are inferior, are of course, wrong for obvious and uninteresting reasons. The anti-racists who claim that race is just a social construct and that race isn't a factor also have it wrong; discussing the issue to both is like talking to a brick wall.
I like actual political threads where the differences between libertarianism, libertarian socialism, social democracy, communism and fascism are discussed and debated; more of that, please.
Name:
21,222011-02-15 18:26
>>24
I think i confused you there. I was talking to you about 17, not replying about what you said. I'm just pointing out that the guy is a racist idiot and it doesn't look like he's going to listen to any of us no matter what we say.
ps Totaly agree about the good political threads
Name:
Anonymous2011-02-15 22:15
>>25
libertarianism: big black niggers don't get their welfare checks
libertarian socialism: big black niggers sell weed to hippies
social democracy: big black niggers get everything for free
communism: big black niggers get everything for free, in theory
fascism: big black niggers are shackled and returned to the fields
>>31
You can say whatever you want about them, but they're human. That's more than can be said about blacks.
By the way, you guys can call me racist all you want, I already know I am (per the current definition of humanity). I'm no more ignorant or close minded than you, though. You've been indoctrinated to believe blacks and non-blacks are equal ever since you were born. You call me these things and you can't refute my arguments with anything but "bawww they used to be slaves and are discriminated against."
So why do blacks have exponentially higher crime rates in countries like Canada and the UK where they were never slaves? Why have Haiti and all of black Africa always been a shithole?
Name:
Anonymous2011-02-16 13:40
>>30
But if you believe the first axiom then you are a racist.
Name:
Anonymous2011-02-16 16:15
I'm against illegally obtaining information.
Two wrongs don't make a right.
Name:
Anonymous2011-02-16 16:50
>>33
Yup, that's exactly what it says. And it also says you are less than black. Therefore subsubhuman...