>>3
Perhaps politics is relegated to that level due to the paradox of all organizations being politicized thus leaving individuals as the only reliable "think tanks", kind of like heisenburg's uncertainty principle.
The thing is the servers who support open source politics are likely to be biased also as there will be one server for communists, another for fascists, another for fundamentalists and so forth, try as you might to focus them on pragmatic issues the fact remains most people prefer to discuss the interesting controversial issues that relate to their own coping mechanisms in their everyday lives. Like most issues in politics this boils down to people's political culture, for instance democracy has the potential to vote itself out and likewise if people are unwilling to be impartial and objective then political life will reflect that so in order to be a success your idea would have to be approached pretty carefully taking this into account and avoiding all these trapfalls.
One possible avenue for advancement is the politician's reliance on facts to support their appeals to emotion which is one route to drag the ignorant masses kicking and screaming into the light, a politician's promises aren't worthless if they won't work, by creating a reputation for being logical, impartial and unbiased a server for such open source politics could become a bank of knowledge that politicians and their supports have to continually refer to in order to back up their points. 2 levels of information, a series of straight clear cut facts with their sources categorized based on the issues they are a part of and various political group's theories based on the facts.