>>45
It's e=mc^2 [pomposity]ACTUALLY[/pomposity]. And in actuality, yes, e=mc^2 only explains 1 of 4 fundamental interactions, so there will be scientists pointing out contradictions and questioning it's validity. Both Isaac Newton with his classical physics and Einstein with his relativity believed there was a chance their theories would be displaced by a more accurate theory in the distant future, even though the facts they had at the time indicated they were correct. Why? Because they knew science does not give you absolute certainty, you don't have all the facts and you don't have the intelligence needed to analyze everything fully, philosophy is fundamental in order to understand scientific method and implement it correctly.