>>73
We are really talking about whether or not there was one, not whether we could possibly find one.
Oh. Well, I'm not sure when the topic took a turn towards that route. I was just arguing the fallacy of
>>31 's claim, nothing more, nothing less.
I said the evidence for it being there is not there, but it cannot be possibly ruled out ever, like the existence of god in god's mystical god world where we can never inspect.
Fair enough, I can agree with that. True, even discovered areas are still debated, like the reference I cited in
>>47