>>56
I thought we had already transitioned this thread beyond stupid party rhetoric. Vote based on what will help in the long run and against what will hurt in the long run.
Besides, you could have phrased that concern better. You make it sound like Democrats are being elected in those states because their constituents don't have the majority vote throughout their respective states. (My first variation on the former sentence was "A Democratic tumor in a Republican body ... if you break it up it doesn't matter anymore" but I removed it because it sounded too hostile. I still feel I should apologize for it.)