Natures natural adjustment mechanism is disease. But that is being interfered with. People are living longer than ever due to advancements in medicine so much so that it isn't sustainable anymore.
Name:
Anonymous2011-07-21 18:16
Let's start world war 3. Too many americunts now a days are too fat and thus become easier targets. Too much junk food and video games for you AmeriKKKa. Enjoy your freedom while it lasts ;p
Name:
Anonymous2011-07-21 18:38
Who says there is overpopulation? We have all the technology, energy, and water it would take to sustain a hundred billion or more Humans and their animals and even much of their lifestyle. The oceans alone are being mismanaged to the tune of trillions of calories annually.
The problem is not 'over-population.'
It is, basically, 'under-education.'
We have to cultivate, through education, a culture and economy that is stable, sustainable, and growing. As for genetic purity and such, it's all irrelevant. Cultural purity is all that matters. Intellectual purity. And I'll tell you why: in fifty years, we're going to be able to stop dying off and upload our consciousness into synthetic bodies. Believe it; it's inevitable. If not this generation, then the next one. I intend to be among the first Humans to outlive death.
Name:
Anonymous2011-07-23 14:32
>>42 sustain a hundred billion or more Humansm. upload our consciousness into synthetic bodies
You obviously don't know much about science or you would not have not made the first statement.
Name:
Anonymous2011-07-23 17:49
there should be an efficient birth control rate mechanism with world wide range, since more people consume more resources which are become increasingly rare. Will this ever happen? no.
tl; dr: we are doomed.
Name:
Anonymous2011-07-23 20:16
>>42
I've never met a singularity nut who actually knew anything about science.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-02 13:04
If you don't let Africans and Asians run away from their crowded countries, they will be forced to deal with themselves.
China mode for all of them. Gradually fading fascism beats environment raping anarchy.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-02 13:36
Eugenics and sterilization.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-02 14:18
>>47
Those things are only possible in places with society and government, and the only population problem civilized places have are the hordes of "environment raping anarchists" whining in swarms to replace them and take their stuff because they wanna.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-03 0:03
Liberals promote abortion to kill as many white babies as they can. Then, they invite every pregnant illegal alien they can find to come over here and mass produce warfare babies as fast as they can.
Genocide the Muslims nations. Deport excess people there. Problem solved.
Name:
Anonymous2011-08-04 22:40
Kill all the stupid people. Such as the idiot on the end of the phone who responds to your amending a contract *before* signing it with "That's a legal document, you can't change it!", and crossing out a bit which happens to mention statute with "But that's a statutory thing!"; or the people that, when you've read out a calculation of an account, with all the debits and credits, and they say "but it doesn't work that way", or who tell you "0.02 cents = 0.02 dollars". For the same of the humanity, those people need to be out of the gene pool, we can't afford the risk that they'll pass their stupid gene onto their offspring. Then kill all the Brazilians because fuck Brazil.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-04 17:11
>>3 >>42
These seem to be the only people that get it.
We need to pull these cave-people into the 21st century. Whether they like it or not. Denying that their tribal-music and denying that their religion exists isn't enough.
Their tribal music and religion must be thrown into the fire.
The problem isn't with overpopulation itself, but rather, lack of investment into those new offspring. A civilized white man and white woman would have 1-2 kids, in which they would invest heavily, get them into college, etc. An unruly negroid skank sleeps around, has 10 kids and doesn't give a damn about them.
Africa not only outputs the most population growth, but it outputs the most retarded offspring than any other continent on the planet. Negroids in Africa have average IQ of 70.
I think to address the problem of overpopulation, we must sterilize all negroids with IQs below 95.
Just my two cents on the subject...
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-05 7:09
>>57
Evolution is the drive to produce more offsprings, not the drive to produce most intelligent offsprings. If you think your IQ gives your advantage, then use it to produce more offsprings than competing species.
So the question is as always: if you're so smart, why are you so poor and your potential girlfriend prefers having sex with niggers instead?
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-05 7:18
>>56 David Silverman, President of American Atheists
Why do all Jews have names with "Silver" and "Gold" in them?
Sometimes I think Jews are being too honest by admitting "we love only three things: gold, gold and gold".
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-05 7:23
Then again, how can Jew be an "atheist" and at the same time say "I'm God's chosen and the this land was give to us by God, so we have more rights to it than goyim."
I sense hypocrisy. It's like Ayn Rand opposing altruism and at the same time expressing altruism towards Jewish people.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-05 11:17
>>58
Yes, evolution works that way and yes women are attracted to niggers. That's why the future of humanity looks bleak. No more moon landings, no Mars exploration, no more innovation in science... well, unless East Asians get their shit together and do it.
We could have stopped it by deporting all shitskins back to where they came from. In case, we chose a new dark age (pun not intended).
>>60
Judaism is a religion, however, Yids are an ethnic group (or so they say)
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-06 8:42
>>61
Anyway, this Silverman talks mostly about evil Christianity suffocating all other religions, including his beloved Judaism. I.e. we already have Christfaggotry to deal with and Silverman wants to spawn even more bullshit sect. He will likely support Islam and wearing hijab.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-12 2:16
Convincing white middle classes to have less kids won't solve the real problem, the families having 8 kids in third world countries.
It seems odd that you would specifically target white middle classes, maybe you'd like to explain to us the prejudice behind this.
I'm waiting.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-12 5:47
>>63
It's obvious that has an irrational hatred towards white people as most people these days (including many whites) seem to. It's just like that time the British media condemned a white family for having 3 kids (if I remember correctly), calling it unsustainable and bad for the environment, while the average Muslim there has about 5 kids.
>>63-64
I don't think a family having three kids is unreasonable, but there's a correlation between how fundamental your religious beliefs and how many offspring you produce, a sizable proportion of the Muslim population hold fundamentalist Islamist beliefs, hence the large families. It was the same (and in some cases, still that way) for Catholics about two generations ago.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-14 1:22
All we have to do is let Iran finish their nuclear program. That will solve the overpopulation problem for sure.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-14 3:57
>>65
I know right, natural selection will kill off the feminists who die childless in the cities, ex-communist countries seem to have far lower birth rates as swell.
It just isn't right that it had to be the first race to achieve great wealth that was the first to fall prey to decadence and self-destruction, at least the asians and remaining whites won't make the same mistake after the genocide is complete. You can be sure that the future will not be bright, they will not be so compassionate towards the lesser races and they will be looking carefully at what happened to the western white.
>>68
Resource depletion, climate change, overpopulation, they are all happening.
If you grow old you will see it.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-14 17:44
over-population is a fucking hoax! if you believe in it, carry out your mission on yourself faggot.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-14 19:31
You've got to wonder when the last time a person who talks about overpopulation went into the country side.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-15 5:30
Well overpopulation is real problem only in the third world, so the solution is that those living in developing countries must be exterminated. Problem is that our capitalist system is running by the slave power that is provided by the people living in the third world, so if those people suddenly die, western civilization will collapse.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-15 5:51
>>71
Yes, there is a lot of space in the Sahara and Antarctica, why don't we move the excess billions there?
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-15 5:53
>>70
I'm not the problem, I'm not having 8 kids I can't feed.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-15 5:54
>>72
You're joking but it is an interesting thought. Somalia has similar terrain to the deserts of Australia, yet compare standards of living.
>>76
Remember, you said "HURR THERE IS LOTS OF SPACE IN THE COUNTRYSIDE THERE IS NO OVERPOPULATION" earlier, so it is not a strawman.
This is what you actually believe.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-16 6:43
>>77
No, it is a straw man and you should be embarrassed to insist otherwise. The countryside =/= the fucking desert/tundra. Unless you're posting from the fucking North Pole your countryside is probably green hills, ripe for development. And unless you live in India or Japan, you haven't even the faintest clue of what overpopulation is.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-16 7:47
>>78
So you think your small brain and soft eyeballs glancing momentarily at the countryside through a car window fully illuminates you to the economic situation and various problems that we will face in the future like resource depletion and climate change.
DURR THAT'S A BIG FIELD IT COULD FEED 50 BILLION PEOPLE
Besides, overpopulation begins at the point when people have to lower their standards of living just to increase the population, not the point where people start to starve. Sure, we could fit 50 billion people on the planet if everyone subsisted on rations of lentils but that would be a horrific dystopia that only some kind of psychopath would actually want.
Name:
Anonymous2012-12-16 12:01
>>79
You're still putting words into my mouth, resorting to straw man arguments. Please come back when you've grow up a bit.