>>20
You seem to be the one here wrapped up in Utopian Idealism. I just want to try a system that addresses peoples stated desires better than the current system.
If liberal democracy has failed then your fantasy utopia will fail even harder because it is unrealistic and whatever plan you had in mind will just degrade into a tyranny, which is far far worse than even the most bourgeois capitalist pig dog capitalist democracy.
I guess you don't think that we've already begun a descent into tyranny. Look, all you've done is claim that the idea I've presented is doomed to fail because it's "impractical", without actually stating how it's impractical, and exhibited an almost pathological resistance to authority. What should be growing clearer to everyone everyday is the practical fact that these liberal democracies we've been working on for over two centuries are now are hopelessly corrupted by capitalism(or corporatism) and becoming totalitarian.
And my simple idea of reintroducing freedom to those who claim to want it is impractical? Particularly now, when anyone with an internet connection can have immediate access to all the information on sustainable living they need?
Just a few lines. I haven't even addressed how to constitute/establish this system, yet you believe there is something here that you can argue with. I suppose there is, but you sure haven't found it yet.