>>33
Oh I know, I agree. In an ideal society, corporations wouldn't exist as they do today. Most people would be in control of the means of their own production. I agree with a complete laissez faire, free market economy. But you can't seriously propose that without talk of abolishing the Federal Reserve, and the entire "corporate welfare", and lobbying the government for subsidies that we have today. That's where most of the corruption that anti-capitalists rag on about comes from.
>>34
It didn't fail. People eventually just lost faith in it. It seems to be a flaw in an aging republic that after a while, the state must start to control the lives of the people that it governs.