>>57
>The Title of this thread is Welfare vs. Charity. You then ask "why should a person be FORCED to help someone else?" Then you spend all of your time attempting to support your [this] faulty premise...
Because that, forced vs voluntary, is the essential difference between Welfare and Charity? The only argument you brought up against this point was that somehow the land is a nation's property like the property of a person, therefore the government have the right to any person's property. That socialist argument was explained and defeated posts ago. But reason isn't the thing that stops you from keep going commie on me.
>And I'm the one you think knows "absolutely nothing about the quotes you(I) posted or philosophy in general"?
You don't. And apparently your skill at making logical arguments to support any point you make, is at rock bottom too.