Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Selfishness Is Not a Virtue

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 14:19

The root of all problems in America.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-31 14:40

>>80
I was just talking about chemistry.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-01 11:14

>>79
True scientists assume nothing is absolute.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-01 14:19

You believe in global warming and the Bush administration ceases funding. You believe in gravity and it turns upside down. The only way is to accept Jesus in your heart.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 10:43

I support the editing of inappropriate content in anime for American distribution.

I like some cartoons, some older ones that happen to originate from Japan so I guess that they're "anime". Anime in general and especially its disrespectful and inconsiderate fans (or otakus) though are starting to annoy me. I've seen enough anime over the years from television, video rental stores, and clubs to determine that most of it is nothing but sex, violence, profanity, among other things that are contrary to family values.

Most of the stuff aired on Adult Swim isn't too bad, then again most of it is not in its uncut Japanese form. Anything rated TV-MA regardless of being anime or not is blocked on my television. I no longer like "anime" as a whole, in fact I dislike most of it.

Aside from the actual animes having questionable content, I've seen too many otakus who have no problem doing drugs, stealing, lying, violating the law of chastity, listening to Satanic music, and worshipping Satan.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 10:54

The same trailer trash rednecks who overly support free trade are poor and unemployed because of it. Way to go!

All the word science means is "the branch of systematic study especially of the physical world." What makes the liberal study more valid than the any other one?

I heard someone say, "Greed is good and motivates people to develop new technologies." No it doesn't, all greed develops is how to legally withhold wages, how to exploit workers, and how to trick the public with crappy advertisements.

It's simple. If you give more than you take, you're a good person. If you take more than you give, you're a bad person. Why are wealthy people exempt from this rule?

All the greatest inventions were created from altruism, virtue, art, science, passion, and other factors. The motivation for all the great inventions was never to become rich. If you look at all the rich people throughout history like the robber barons, they weren't inventors or discoverers, just "marketers" and "entrepreneurs". Greedy selfish lazy unnecessary middle-men.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 16:23

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 18:16

>>85
It is not now and never was "trailer trash rednecks" who support free trade and globalization.  This was always pushed by an unholy alliance of country-club Republican plutocrats and the worst extremist elements of the Democratic Party.  The working class in the US has always, always had very strong protectionist leanings, for the simple reason of self-preservation.

The Republicans saw an opportunity to throw their factory workers under the bus and make themselves wealthier than gods, and get rid of those damned pesky labor unions once and for all.

The environmentalist-wacko, rootless-cosmopolitan leftists always wanted to see all those nasty nasty evil factories go away, preferably cease to exist altogether, but if that isn't politically realistic just yet, at least go to China and Mexico, where they can employ poor deserving Third Worlders who have been denied a shot at these jobs by the subhuman redneck union members in Flyover Country, and maybe when China gets rich, it'll increase its nuclear arsenal enough to deter those evil neocons from evil evil evil foreign wars against poor misunderstood Saddam and Osama.  Those "buy American" stickers with the little American flags on them always made the anti-American bicoastal leftist crowd want to vomit anyway.  Stupid flagwaving white-nigger hicks, what do they know anyway?

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 19:43

>>87
If we didn't follow an interventionist foreign policy, none of that would be an issue.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 19:49

Who exactly do I vote for if I want non-interventionism, protectionism, isolationism, and family values all in one?

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 19:49

>>89
Hmm, good question.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 21:08

>>88
Okay, I give up, what the fuck are you talking about?

I'm talking about trade policy.  Why are you talking about foreign policy?

Do you even read what you write before you click on "Reply?"

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 21:48

>>89
Ron Paul!!!

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-24 23:33

>>91
Oh sorry about that. I should have been more detailed about that. Anyway there's quite a bit of interventionism in trade and the economy as well.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-25 18:28

>>92

Ron Paul's campaign doesn't touch the homosexual or drug issues.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-25 22:56

>>94
Yes it does. He doesn't support the war on drugs and he would leave homosexual marriage as well as abortion up to the individual states.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List