>>5
Ok so you score higher on a test than a black man
So?
but he gets the scholarship to fill a quota.
If he scored high enough to fulfill the requisites for said scholarship, and we both get in, then there is no problem. Now if I don't get in simply because I'm White, and because of the aforementioned quota then yes there is a problem.
How is this not racist?
Things certainly can be abused and then later the accused pull "the race card". So yes, discrimination against a White by a non-White and discrimination of a non-White by a White and vice-versa should be treated exactly the same.
now that we have a spic in the supreme court, when will it
be illegal to hire white people?
This is bigoted, ignorant trash. I don't see how having "a spic in the supreme court[sic]" will enact laws that will make it so that it will be "illegal to hire White people". Jesus, do you people even read what you author in your posts before posting them?
Look at the the recent decision on
Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005). Eminent Domain is now going to be abused more than ever, thanks to our wonderful Supreme Court Justices, regardless of race. I don't believe that having "a spic in the supreme court[sic]" is going to make things any worse than how the Supreme Court has been handling its cases for many years now.