>>92
Thank you? wut.
If the approach is plural that entails including those who are apparently crackpots in the "community of ideas", doesn't it? If good ideas don't get accepted instantly it's only because of natural limitations, it takes time for a person to rigorously examine something and understand why they are good ideas and they don't have the time/motivation to examine every single idea every crackpot injects into the ecology.
>>90 covers only a few factors, liberty, equality and the implications of IT are important and ideally we are better off with more of them but it isn't practical to declare this to be a revelation and that everything must be polarised to maximise them. Anarcho-communism would never work because essentially everything must be done heterarchically (democratically) restricting the use of hierarchy and autonomy when it might be more efficient, even if it doesn't go to extremes and just emphasises heterarchy it is still holding a bias which unnecessarily reduces the efficiency of organisations.
Factors like economic freedom, order and hierarchical power structures are often demonised by various groups critical of their excessive levels in their society, but this does not mean that they are an inherant evil and a society free from them would be a utopia. In fact they are often essential to create the conditions where equality and liberty can exist in the first place.