>>51
"how do you intend to stop criminal gangs from taking over in the power vacuum"
this where the marxist roots of collectivist anarchists kick in
before there can be an anachist society you need socialism which will make everybody rich, educated and happy
too happy to fight each other or even commit crimes AND THUS there would be no need for law enforcement, judges, bereaucrats or anything that would make this ideology collapse like a house of cards
yes, that's what anarchists actually believe
bakunin would tell you that there'll be an invisible dictatorship - a secret society that'd guide your criminal gangs into advancing the anarchist cause (tin-foil-hat-bullshit was just as popular back then as it is today if not even more so)
individualist anarchists on the other hand just counter that argument with "YOU SEE THIS RIFLE? BRING IT ON, BITCH!"
justifying with either an "if i couldn't defend myself i didn't deserve to live in the first place" from stirner or "if i pay those gangs to protect me they'd be just like the police force we have right now - or even better since they're working for me now!" from rothbard
i'm not
>>48 and neither am i an anarchist
just wanted to advance the anarchism discussion on /newpol/ a bit