>>189
I said humanity would stagnate.
OK. What reasons do you believe would make it stagnate?
Do you equate the economic condition with humanity?
No. That's just one facet of it.
Do you believe that the two current major economic philosophies are mutually exclusive, and/or that a new philosophy will not be conceived?
Are you speaking of the Keynesian and Austrian school of economic philosophies? Well, Keynesian philosophy is what is put into practice now. To me, it hasn't exactly shown itself to be a good philosophy when put into such practice. As for a new philosophy being conceived, I cannot say. Although if one does form I would be willing to have a serious look into it.
And by the way, though there's no telling how the left would have screwed it up, one can't deny that the right has been at the reigns for quite a while, and that they led us into this swamp.
Well the thing is there's really not much difference between the left or right or Republicans and Democrats. They're both big spenders and they're both for bigger government.
I say the whole left/right, Republican/Democrat name blaming game is completely pointless. It really draws people away from the overall bigger picture.
Then depending on what you mean by "promoted", I respect your understanding of conservatism. In matters of society, family, and morality, I view myself as being conservative in the extreme.
Well, I'm not exactly sure myself how it should be promoted. I certainly wouldn't want the public to be saturated with it, that's for sure. That is something I think the people should ultimately decide for themselves. But if people promote, I wouldn't object to it.