>>136
135 here...
Can't say you wrote anything difficult to understand in there. I have studied some Marxism, and communism in general, and study political science.
I don't think that will happen. Here is why. Say 500 workers own a car factory (I have noo idea how many people work at car factories, so this is a quite random number, but it will illustrate my point.), the workers will not vote to give their part of the factory to one person, because 499 would not gain on this.
And just because the ratio between supply and demand is complicated doesn't mean that you need a free market to solve it. It's not like the capitalist system really solves anything. Yes, it would be more effective, but e.g. there is more research on drugs to boost the male erection, than there is on HIV and AIDS medicine. Even if it is perfectly clear that there is a bigger need or "demand", if you want, for the medicine.
As far as Stalin. I will never go so far as call him a true communist. This was clear pretty much all the time, and was especially easy to see during and after the Moskva trials after the exclusion of Trotsky.
There will always be asses out there who wants too rule over people, but i don't think there will be more of them under socialism than capitalism.