>>36
no one said Marxism and Capitalism weren't economic theories. Fascism is completely separate from the two.
That's why it calls itself the "third way"
Before you try to come in here with your grade school government class education, and try to sound all important because you know the difference between economic policy and social policy, how about you try to read the conversation and try to contribute something worthwhile instead of spouting off pretentious political talking points like a fucking dumbass?
>>37
I'd have to disagree that how successful Fascism and Communism were is directly correlated to the countries political and industrial past.
I think the country's past just affects which ideology can get the support of the people.
Unless you mean success in a different way than I am assuming (that the country's economy grows), in which case, disregard.