Racism and its repeated religious memes

Go to a feminist site and you'll see feminists using their terminology to agree with each other in reference to their shared worldview, based on repeating the same views until they agree that their view is the true worldview, and visitors who do not agree, who bring up arguments on why the feminist view is flawed, are criticized not based on their arguments, but based on the critic being outside their circle of agreement, outside of their shared truth, and not being with them, they are then against them, and are easier to label as working with or for the defined enemy, since the defined enemy is also against them.  For Feminists, this enemy is defined as the Patriarchy, and those who are against Feminism are likely pawns of the Patriarchy.  To counteract the perceived threat of the Patriarchy, the Feminist organization reacts based on what it believes the Patriarchy is doing, until it mirrors the perceived enemy, becoming that which it fears most. 

To Christians, the enemy is Satan, and those who oppose Christianity are assumed to be under the influence of Satan, since both those who are opposed and the perceived enemy are against their shared worldview.

Liberals believe the enemy is Conservatives who spout propaganda, and create propaganda to combat this perceived threat.  Conservatives believe Liberals control the media, and dominate the media to combat this perceived threat.  Anti-Communists perceive Communists as controlling everything, and seek more control in response.  Latter-day Saints and Scientologists tell themselves their religion is true, and all others are false since they don't agree with their claim that they are the real truth, so they must spread their views quickly and gain more members to counteract the non-believers in the world.  Anti-Masons see Freemasons everywhere, conspiracy theorists see the government everywhere, and militant groups stockpile weapons to counter their perceived threat of armed people who will be out to get them.    

Racialist and White Nationalist organizations have these traits: defined concepts and terminology agreed upon by its members, reinforcing ideas to be true and correct through agreement and repetition within the group, creating a worldview defined as those who agree with their worldview versus those who don't, and since those who don't are against them, these people either are the enemy, or they are unwitting pawns of the enemy, since the the enemy is defined as being opposed to their set of views while controlling perceptions of everyone else, so if you're against their views and you're not a Jew then you must be under the Jew's control since that's what they do, like Satanists to Christians, the Patriarchy to Feminists, or the government to conspiracy theorists.

The reaction to the defined threat is to build a defense based on the defined threat, until becoming the mirror of what the threat is perceived to be.

I think Jews control the news media to insert their own bias and alter the perceptions of the public, so I'm going to create a magazine, news site and television station based on my bias so it can alter the perceptions of the public: National Vanguard.

I think the Jews infiltrate academia to spread false ideas as truth based on their self supporting evidence, so I'm going to infiltrate academia to spread false ideas as truth based on my own self supporting evidence: The Institute for Historical Review

I think the Jews make up evidence based on faulty data to support a predetermined conclusion that the Holocaust happened, so I'm going to make up evidence based on faulty data to support a predetermined conclusion that the Holocaust didn't happen: The Adelaide Institute.

I think the facts on Martin Luther King are lies meant to favor Jewish bias, so I'm going to present lies of Martin Luther King as facts and recommend you read more David Duke: Martinlutherking.org  

I think Jews make vulgar entertainment and expect people to appreciate it, so I'm going to make vulgar cartoons to get people to appreciate it: White Aryan Resistance

I think Wikipedia is filled with assumed facts based on Jewish manipulation of information, so I'm going to start a wiki with assumed facts based on manipulation of information: Metapedia

We agree on our worldview, and we agree it's the right worldview, therefore it's the right worldview.  If you're against this worldview, since we're right, you're wrong.  Since you're wrong, either you're against us intentionally, or you're an unwitting pawn, based on my worldview that I told you, and you should agree with it, because I told you:     

http://www.resist.com/racistgames/FLASH/Flash_WhiteWillPt1.htm

>>5

Scholarly sources with good research done by experts is either cherry picked for selective data or not used at all, since it doesn't agree with the ontological assumptions presented, so more often the source will be associated the originating group, considering itself more trustworthy than academia when opposed.  A Christian argument will tend to use Christian sources, referring you to more Christian produced publications, rather than stepping back and removing itself from its own self reinforcing perspective to find an objective viewpoint.  The attitude becomes "prove me wrong" and the people who can form an argument know they will be ignored anyway, because the group agrees with itself and will do everything it can to continue, even if it means being dishonest.  Look at each logical statement- is it subjective, is it biased, is it cherry picked, does it come from a non-biased source, does it present some facts but fill the rest with rationalized assumption or subjective interpretation, does the argument already assume the conclusion or affirm the consequent?  Write ten logical statements using the word JEWS, JEWS, and JEWS.