Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Watch a libfag head explode

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-30 14:57

If niggers only commit a wildly disproportionate percentage of crimes because they are "poor" ...

... then please tell me what the economic motive was for this crime: http://www.newsnet14.com/2008/01/texas-girl-barbecued-by-black-boyfriend/

And this one: http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/newsom.asp

And this one: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=3110D02A-EA5E-4F8C-876D-AE2B3E0530BC



No, there was no economic motive in these crimes. Just pure savagery and hatred.

See, you nigger-loving liberals will always excuse even the most barbaric behaviors of niggers as somehow being Whitey's fault. That kind of diseased thinking is more than just White guilt; it's actually a form of self-hatred.

The real reason niggers are disproportionately poor is the same reason niggers commit a disproportionate percentage of violent crimes: Because they are wild animals unable to control themselves and behave responsibly in an advanced society. This is what is known as a confounding variable: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confounding_variable

In short, it's not that poverty "causes" crime. Instead, it's that being a violence-prone sub-human creature leads one to BOTH poverty AND criminality.

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-30 15:07

>>1
Sir, you are a pitch black stain of failure on my white shirt. My head didn't explode, but I laughed like thunder at your blatant lack of intellectual rigor. Did you just take three lonely examples, without any mention of the global crime numbers, and make it seem like it was the general case? I am saddened by the fact that it appears to be the case... Thank you for your time, flaccid penis. TMTY.

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-30 15:27

>>2

So, no counter-argument? Just inane personal attacks? LULZ...typical.

Check this out: http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.pdf

Maybe you'll take that AIDS-infested nigger dick out of your mouth long enough to read it. ^_^

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-30 17:01

>>3
Even more stupid. How could this be "inane personal attacks" as long as I have no idea who you are - and no intention to discover it - ? As for the "So, no counter-argument?" part, I facepalmed so hard my brain bounced against the wall.

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-30 17:35

>>1

... then please tell me what the economic motive was for this crime:
http://www.newsnet14.com/2008/01/texas-girl-barbecued-by-black-boyfriend/

She tasted like chikin !
NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-30 18:04

>>4

Still no counter-argument? Waiting for your Jew sociology professor to give you the Kosher-approved politically correct comeback?

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-30 21:20

>>5
I guess he was hungry.

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-31 14:29

>>6
He already made a counter-argument, dumbass. It was in his first post and you ignored it because it shows you are an ignorant bigot.

Three isolated cases in a population of millions is not a trend.

Name: Anonymous 2008-12-31 20:27

>>2

We take enjoyment from watching you speak those things which go against sound thoughts and opinions. Like a spectator watching displays of animals, we take enjoyment from observing your expressions of thought. I watch. We watch. Some fail and argue, others grin with pleasure.

Many people define it as 'Liberalism'. Others define it as entertainment.

Thank you puppets.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-01 0:22

>>8
If it were only three, it wouldn't be.

However, niggers are only 10% of the population yet commit 80% of the violent crime.  How's that 14th Amendment working out for you?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-01 1:18

The poorer you are, the less you get educated as well as the more you are haunted by superstition.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-01 6:34

>>9
oh yeah?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-01 9:25

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-01 21:16

>>10
Now you're arguing in circles. The very point of bringing these three isolated incidences is what makes them isolated to begin with: these cases were not influenced by the criminal(s) desire for money (except that one started as a carjacking and another a robbery). Don't even try to pretend that "80% of the violent crime" in this country is anywhere near the scale presented in these cases, either.

Black people hardly have a monopoly on ultra-violent crimes in America. Our most notorious serial- and mass-murderers have generally been white. Bruce Pardo, of the recent "Santa Massacre" was a pissed-off whitey. Unless you account for all acts of this magnitude, picking and choosing a few murders to help your case isn't a good argument.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-02 14:08

>>14
That's only because niggers, with their smallish cranial capacities and IQs averaging around 75, generally don't have sufficient functioning synapses to evade the police long enough to rack up a lot of kills.  But their general viciousness and homicidal jungle-monkey instincts, inescapably written into their genes, more than make up for it in the aggregate.

Niggers very nearly DO have a monopoly on violence in America.  What little violent crime they are not responsible for is usually committed by Mexicans and Puerto Ricans.

If one could wave a magic wand and return all the niggers to Africa, America would instantly become the safest nation on Earth, even with all the Mexicans and Puerto Ricans who would remain here.  And not having to write all those welfare checks every month, not having to give Rastus and Dayshawn their free three hots and a cot and free cable TV and free weight-lifting equipment and free health care every day in prison, would probably instantly balance the nation's governmental budgets as well.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-02 17:55

>>15
These illegal immigrants are taking jobs that could be given to our nation's prisoners. What we need is a socialist worker's movement for prisoners in order to take jobs from illegal immigrants and put our prisoners back into the plantations where they belong. It would be progressive and egalitarian. Anyone who disagrees is a racist.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-02 20:31

>>16
Hey, it's not that immigrants are taking our jobs away from us, it's the COMPANIES that give them jobs. The incentive alone is enough. These companies would rather pay illegals 2 dollars an hour VS. paying a White American citizen minimum or above minimum wage to do the same exact job. No wonder why we're all fucking miserable!

Great idea with in regards to prisoners! I believe it would work. All they do is stab each other over retarded gang drama anyway. Useless pile of flesh, they are.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 8:05

>>17
You forget that companies are owned by law abiding Americans and they have rights too. Obviously you are elitist fascist racist capitalist sexist. Now they can pay $1.50 an hour to the state in return for rehabilitating prisoner labour.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 18:14

I love how retarded losers believe in pseudoscience so that it can tell them, even though their individual IQ probably is around 60, they are better than niggers because their average is 75 or something, and people who share his complexion have a higher average - of course, one could point out that this is fallacious and completely retarded - buut, the proponents of this ARE retarded, why else would you refuse science and delude yourself into depreciated delusions only perpetrated by other clinically retarded losers?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 21:15

>>19
I love how you made unsupportable claims and saged the thread.

I bet you're fourteen years old and both your parents are sweating blood to send you to the whitest private school they can, because it's obvious you've never seen niggers except for the photogenic ones they put on the jewtube for propaganda purposes.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List