Is terrorism the only solution?

If abolishing the Fed is the key to saving this country, we know it won't happen anytime soon, or not through normal politics.  Even if a politician was in a position to abolish it, it would never go through due to the intense involvement of its supporters.  What if the only answer is to physically blow up each Fed building, McVeigh style?  What if the cost, including the death penalty, was worth it?  The history books only mention violent revolutions because there are no peaceful revolutions.  Someone, somewhere, during a time of stagnant stability, decided to take violent action to enact change, knowing the risks involved to self and society.  Revolution, by definition.  What if it's long been time to radically change history, to have something else to remember besides The Boston Tea Party?

Terrorism is a very selfish act, and it is a permanent solution to a temporary problem. Only jerks commit terrorism.

Or people that actually get results. MLK stands and talks little chanes. He dies and his people storm the streets in riots. Previously quiet politians say "OMG these blacks will kills us, lets do something!" 40 years later a black man takes the white house. That's Change

WOW ignorants fucks (1)terrorists are freedom fihters and freedom fighters are terrorists. so your saying the boston tea party was a selfish act or because it helped you it wasnt terrorism. So to answer this question yes. If you want to change something terrorism is the answer. the war in iraq, those people are "Terrorists" to us but to others they're freedom fighters. So they are trying to change things so terrorism is the only answer for most things.

>>4
Suicide bombing a bazaar isn't fighting for freedom nor is it any way comparable to the Bosteon Tea Party (or maybe the official records forget to mention a crazed puritan crashing his cart packed with gunpowder into an angelican chapel?), you dumb cunt.
But what the hell, blow yourself up if you want to, heroic freedom fighter. Go for a strategically important government installation like a Wal-Mart or an elementary school to underscore that you did it for freedom and not because you're homicidal asspie.

>>1
You're welcome to try it but keep in mind that as soon as you start searching for helpers you'll be raped by the feds.
And unless you're in a special position with access to military equipment doing this on your own means years of preparation (change of political climate) which end with the decision not to bother anymore because you're too old for this shit and want to start a family instead.

Idiots there no such thing as terrorism in ISlam

and

One 1988 study by the US Army found that over 100 definitions of the word "terrorism" have been used.[6]

why are muslims labled as terrorist??
there are the same number of muslim terrorits as there r jewish terrorist and christian terrorist

has any one of u actually met a terrorist the only place i have seen terrorist r the ones that r dislpayed on televeision
thats it other than that i have never met a muslim terrorist
its all b.s

>>8

Hes right its just media  rhetoric.  There is no such thing as terrorism, all of you have been fooled.

he is rigt the media sucks jews r the real terrorist

nazi rulez

I'm sure the victims of Muslim extremism think terrorism is fake. Morons.

>>4
They would of been terrorists if they lost, but because they won they are not. Its as simple as that.

Cohen.   lets think domestic, more people die from heart disease then Muslim extremism in america

>>1

"The history books only mention violent revolutions because there are no peaceful revolutions."

India called.

>>15

So -that's- who was phone! O_O
I fuckin' knew it...ò_ó

>>1
Last I heard, the Fed is private-owned. Meaning, whatever the gummint wants, a private body, not democratically elected, gets to decide how much the gummint's (and our) money is worth. And, effectively, who gets to have how much. Real power, zero democracy.

Solution? Nationalize the Fed.
When's it gonna happen? When pigs fly; they got too much power already.
Conclution? We're phuxx0rd. Atleast until (and unless) we find some clever ways to topple them.

Oh, and forget terrorism. That's a huge big own goal if ever there was one. For starters, they're using terrorists as scarecrows and red herring for the sheeple while sneaking in martial law thru the back door.

They say Osama hates our freedom? If so, then he's won. Bigtime. He'd be popping every champaigne bottle he could get his hands on, if only some big green book hadn't said no to alcohol.

>>15
If you think India's independance was peaceful, came from revolution and would have succeeded if Britain was a vicious despotism not a democracy fatigued by world war 2, you will need to commit suicide immediately.

>>15

I take it you forgot about the riots and other shit that went down at the time India gained its independence. Not exactly bloodless. I'll grant you it was not a full scale war either.