Present-day society is wholly based on the exploitation of the vast masses of the working class by a tiny minority of the population, the class of the landowners and that of the capitalists. It is a slave society, since the “free” workers, who all their life work for the capitalists, are “entitled” only to such means of subsistence as are essential for the maintenance of slaves who produce profit, for the safeguarding and perpetuation of capitalist slavery.
So, because there is no law against ruining 10,000 peoples lives, that means there shouldn't be?
No, not really pwned. Not at all.
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-28 14:18
>>46 >>46
Dude, what comeback!
And in the next episode our asspie superhero will ask questions such as
"If you fart downwind and there's no one there to hear it, does it still smell?"
and "WUTS UR FAVORITE POKEMAN? I LIEK PIKACHU!"
>>48
No, I don't believe that you see anything past the top line with post number, name and date.
You just link to the pervious post to make a completely retarded comment about whatever bugs you at the moment.
>>53
We really need to make laws that prevent ALL banks from lending out more than 10 dollars for every one they have.
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-28 15:28
>>54
Come to think of it, that would cause deflation and increase jobs. Hmm, that's not a bad idea.
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-28 15:39
>>54 >>55
aspie talks to himself for the 4th time now
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-28 15:49
>>56
No, I'm right. Think about it. If banks want to create more money, the only way to do that would be to have more money. The best way to do that would be people that have jobs depositing money, and hence it would then be in the banks best interest to have depositors with jobs. Deflation occurs because there's less cash, and the purchasing power of the dollar increases.
>>26
The government risked everyone's money by keeping interest rates too low. Maybe you should tell that to the state.
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-29 20:55
>>24
So the free market is a sacred inviolable infallible entity that always gets everything right and if they regulated absolutely no aspect of the economy it would do everything perfectly and there would never be any problems.
I'd say that the current American situation is far from Socialism, at least - real Socialism. Don't believe those Republican nutjobs - Bush isn't a Socialist, American isnt' Socialist, you're most likely not Socialist - You don't just become Socialist by caring for others, believe it or not.
However - Capitalism has its flaws, and they're quite obvious at the moment, perhaps people will actually, humm - I don't know, consider looking at alternate idealogies now instead of grabbing hold of their right-wing mentalities and staying there for all they're worth.
Name:
Anonymous2008-10-02 21:05
>>62
The government takes money at gunpoint from the productive and distributes it to freeloading kike bankers and parasitic niggers. If this is not socialism, what is it?
Name:
Anonymous2008-10-02 21:20
>>60
Of course not, that's not my point. Because people are stupid and make mistakes there is no point in putting all your eggs in one basket.
If someone in a free market makes a mistake ONLY THEY SUFFER.
If someone in the state makes a mistake EVERYONE SUFFERS.
Name:
Anonymous2008-10-02 22:06
You are CORRECT, sir!
"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of misery." -- Winston Churchill
Name:
Anonymous2008-10-02 22:11
I agree that regulations are the only thing that make monopolies thrive. The really bad ones even.
People just don't want to admit that government doesn't want to protect the people necessarily. It's main priority is to look good and grow larger. Regulations look good, and require more legislation. With more bills passed, the politicians look better. And everyone is happy.
Is it the best solution? No. But thats also subjective to each scenario. Sometimes it can be good, who knows. Most of the times though, it sure isn't.
Name:
Anonymous2008-10-04 13:39
The current western political system is plutocratic, particularly in the US.
Because the same people who rule are in control of the media, (example: Jeb Bush) they succeed in convincing the majority they live in a democracy, which makes them much easier to control, and willing to work, fight and even die for their "freedom."
Everything the government does is motivated by the desire for more power or money for their already wealthy friends who generally own the means of production in every area of the economy.
Until the true nature of the media is exposed to the "masses," and somehow independently regulated for complete honesty and integrity, we will be bombarded with propaganda and never see the light of democracy.
Name:
Anonymous2008-10-04 15:09
>>the same people who rule are in control of the media, (example: the old-money Jews of the Ochs-Sulzberger family who own the Jew York Times, Jew Michael Eisner who owns ABC and Disney)
fix'd
Name:
Anonymous2008-10-04 15:42
I believe one of the ways the media has tried to suppress conspiracy "theories" is by trying to associate these ideas with anti-semitism, reptilian shapeshifters, and other offensive or impossible ideas.
I don't know if poster 68 on this thread is genuinely anti-semitic, or trying to take away credibility from post 67 by aligning it with bigotry.
Either way, I think 68 is either ignorant or engaging in misinformation.
There may well be some Jewish people conspiring, but it is foolish (or deliberately harmful to the debate) to say ALL Jews are conspirators, or that ALL conspirators are Jewish.
Name:
Anonymous2008-10-04 15:56
>>69 >>67 was talking about who is in control of the newsmedia, the entertainment media, who owns the big-city newspapers, who owns the TV networks, who dictates what we can and cannot say.
Are you denying that the hand of the Jew can be seen in all these places?
Name:
Anonymous2008-10-04 17:27
>>70
I posted both 67 and 69, and I think "the hand of the Jew" as you put it, is seen whenever you spend enough time looking for it.
One can just as easily point the finger of accusation at Christians (eg. Bush), Freemasons, the CIA, FEMA or the Neo-con elite when it comes to the wider sense of corruption (though I do think those last three ARE exclusively anti-social!).
I can't say I know exactly who pulls all the strings, but a lot of non-Jewish people profit from the lies on TV (eg: Jeb and G.W. Bush), are they in collusion with a secret network of Jews? I can't prove they aren't, but I doubt it.
And whether they are or not, it's unhelpful to any serious debate (not to mention dangerous) to accuse one single race or religion of secretly working against society.
If we want to live in a free and tolerant democracy, we need to remember that the enemy is corruption, not Judaism, Islam or Catholicism.
How is it that kikes, who are less than 1% of the population, utterly dominate all the movie production studios, all the television networks, all the newspapers--all the daily agitprop, in other words, that tells us all every day what we are and aren't allowed to say, what we are and aren't allowed to think, what ideas and forms of expression are acceptable among the "respectable people" on the prolefeed, and how we are to view the world?
And how is it that they also utterly dominate the banking system and the stock market, so (surprise surprise!) they're making out like bandits AGAIN in this month's government bailout?
They're not even 1% of the population, Puppet Boy. Look at the strings and tell me who pulls them.
Name:
Anonymous2008-10-07 9:28
If you guys weren't so concerned with blaming jews for everything perhaps you would have the time to do your own research and come up with an argument that holds water. Especially the national socialists, I've noticed a lot of marxist terms here, "means of production", "plutocracy", now I'm not saying that's why you're wrong but I mean Germany did some pretty bad things under national socialism, pretty fucking terrible things. China and Russia didn't do very well under communism either and apparently socialism is just a stepping stone to communism. I don't think we should go there.
>>73
In other words, you CAN'T explain why Jewfilth dominates the media, banks and critical government agencies while being only 1% of the population of the USA.
It's the biggest conspiracy on Earth, and you refuse to even see it. The U.S. Congress just voted to dump $800 billion all over it, and again you refuse to see it. That's because the media has trained you all from BIRTH to avoid seeing the Jew. You'd rather stick a fork in your eye than see the Jew.
Name:
Jewfilth2008-10-07 15:42
>>74
Ya know, Mr.RedCream, we're really getting tired of you spouting off this nonsense about us...
>>76
Like I said: You're trained from birth to not see the Jew.
Name:
Anonymous2008-10-08 2:46
>>77
So logic was created by jews to stop people from seeing that they control the world.
Name:
Anonymous2008-10-08 15:10
>>78
Bingo. That's why retardation and ignorance is the way to protect the Aryan race.
Name:
Anonymous2008-10-08 15:20
>>79
Strangely those also seem to be the source of capitalist cocksucking arguments aswell, so, there is a lot those two fundamental American values safeguard.