Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

How do you feel about the past 8 years?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-10 6:49

Just answer. Anon doesn't care who you're voting for. Personal experiences only. No neo-con vs liberal faggotry. Just answer.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-20 22:45

The past 8 years have been a setup for a federal government takeover of everything, including your ballsacks. I'm sure that most Anons can find it quite entertaining. I mean, Bush is like the biggest prank job in the history of mankind. I'm sure he has LULZ tattooed on his ass.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-20 23:19

gb2/b/, FailCream.  When you admit you do it only for the lulz you cease to be taken seriously.

Face it.  YOU LOST THE GAME

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-21 7:00

>>14

Your predictions never pan out. Remember when you said that Obama would *never* win the primary? Remember when you said there was a jew conspiracy to get Hill-dog elected?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-21 20:46

>>43
OH SNAP

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-22 17:39

>>38
Well we must both admit posting in these forums is somewhat of a hobby, RedCream has gone wrong by allowing it to become obsession. I'm imagining he's quite a lonely deluded figure with a lot of free time who idolises the fantasy of being part of a select few who know the "troof".

>>39
http://www.oecd.org/document/60/0,2340,en_2649_34533_1942460_1_1_1_1,00.html

France's income tax can be anywhere between 10 and 50% but it has a flat payroll tax of 45%, which means whenever a company wants to employ someone it has to hand over 80% of what they pay their employee to the government, not an incentive to pay high wages or create jobs. Additionally it has a 33% income tax and 20% sales tax reduced to 5% for things like food.

It's GDP is $2.232 trillion and it's government expenditure (not income) is $1.211 trillion which is 54.3% of it's GDP.

>>40
>REDCREAM IS WIN.
You have self esteem issues.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-23 0:52

Remember the election in 2006? wrote:Thought you might like to read the following:
A little over one year ago:

1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon and crude was $50 a barrel;
3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.

Since voting in a Democratic Congress in 2006 we have seen:

1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $3.50 a gallon and crude to $117 a barrel;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion dollars;
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.

America voted for change in 2006, and we got it!

Name: APM-E150d 2008-09-23 1:56

The national park services were really fucked over.

Name: s War? 2008-09-23 5:39

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-25 11:01

The economy went from bad to sad..  nuff said

Name: RedCream 2008-09-25 12:44

>>49
CORRECTION:  The economy went from "shallow denial" to "DEEP denial".

Just wait until the assfucks in the Congress get safely re-elected.  Then the kid gloves will come OFF.  Soup lines?  YOU'RE GONNA SEE 'EM EVERYWHERE.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-26 18:39

>>46
That's because there's a lag between economic policy change and actual results of that policy.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-26 18:56

Actually, one of the more recent explanations for the fall of empires is soil erosion. The time it takes for the soil to go away is also the time it takes for a huge civilization to rise and fall. Messianic Jewish carpenters and barbarians have little to nothing to do with this. If barbarians were anything more than an opportunistic infection, then the empire would never have arisen to begin with.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-26 19:01

Don't forget that the ruling classes of Rome were driving themselves batshit insane with incest and lead poisoning.

Name: ScienceAnon! 2008-09-26 19:05

>>40
I would only hope that america would get to this. Can you imagine the discoveries we would make if there was free college? Can you even imagine how many people who could possibly benefit the world has been left out because they didnt have the stellar amount of money? Hell there are tons of college kids who get their wonderful mommies and daddies to pay for their useless art or business degree that means nothing unless they find someone. There are tons of science students like myself that are being scorned out of the system because we dont have the money and arent going for that MBA and dont have the parents to back us up. Geez and its not like you guys in France arent behind. If anything you are AHEAD.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-26 22:54

>>54
90% of college students don't belong in college and have no business being there in the first place.  Too many colleges have lowered their requirements to the lowest common denominator because it brings in money, and now they've made a bachelor's degree all but meaningless.  How many college graduates can write a grammatically correct sentence, or balance their checkbooks?  How many high school diplomas have been handed out to booger-eating morons who can't write their own names or make change for a dollar?

No one with an IQ under 125 or SAT scores under 1250 should even be on a college campus, unless it's to mow the lawns and mop the floors--and even that work could be done by students to pay for part of their tuition.  90% of "college students" have no business being on campus.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-27 7:21

taxes are higher in europe

it's not how much you pay, it's what you get back for it?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-27 11:16

>>55
1250?  Shit, I got that on my SAT in 8th grade.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-27 14:20

>>53
At least they weren't smoking crack.

Name: RedCream 2008-09-27 20:53

>>55
You could have just said "because excess students in college made more money for the Jew bankers" and that would have sufficed.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-28 0:23

>>59
You could have said nothing whatsoever and improved this thread's signal-to-noise ratio, FailCream.   gb2/b/

Name: RedCream 2008-09-28 1:09

>>60
Jewtool.

Name: RedCream 2008-09-28 19:55

>>60
Jewlover.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-28 21:40

>>62
Once you start to actually post something intelligent, perhaps then we'll see.  Until then, your actions are in diametric opposition to your claims of intelligence, RedCram

Name: RedCream 2008-09-29 20:10

>>63
Jewsucker.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List