Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Name: ROLO!OLOR 2008-09-06 3:24

I'd like to be an Anarchist. What do I do next?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 15:23

>>40
I haven't made any claims in the affirmative. I have nothing to prove. It suffices to say that I am skeptical of government in any form because history is filled with its abuses.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 15:38

>>41
LETS NOT CHANGE THE TOPIC
You claimed I was wrong. You know how negation works?
That's right, you say ¬isolated = true.
AND
>Second, NO ONE WANTS INTERNATIONAL POLITICS. Anarchists don't want wars, "free trade" agreements, United Nations observers, peacekeepers or inspectors, or any other bullshit that limits their freedoms
Now you better start writing your thesis. (How about with the title: "I might contradict myself but I'm not, I swear!")

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 15:47

>>42
The better question is, do you know how debate works?

And I stand by my statement that anarchists are disinterested in international politics simply because they have nothing to gain. Anarchist communities would have volunteer militias with all modern military weapons (there's no laws prohibiting arms) and high economic output for deterrence, so there's no need for entangling alliances. But that's not to say they wouldn't fight on the same side as another state against a common enemy. However, enemy states would only be designated as such after an aggressive provocation on behalf of the state.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 16:02

>>43
First, l2anarchy.
Anarchy != Isolationism.
l2anarchy
Also, l2politics. lulz
l2anarchy <-- I'm just going to leave that there. Have a nice day.

SO, THAT'S HOW DEBATES WORK, MAH BOI

And the second part shows how much you fail at international politics.
Behaving like that would make them mercenaries which means execution of captured soldiers and sanctions from the UN.
Breaking sanctions → LOL NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST
But they won't even get that far because unrestricted arms trade would already get them really high on the United States' "Countries to liberate"-list.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 16:29

>>44
>However, enemy states would only be designated as such after an aggressive provocation on behalf of the state.

Try again.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 16:49

>>45
Haha, and you wanted to tell me something about the high art of debate.
Quit grasping for straws and suck it up: You don't know shit about political philosophy.
I even let it slide that you claimed there wouldn't be laws against gun ownership.
No brand of Anarchism is, as of now, not mature enough to be applied to a sovereign country.
The pinkos were at least were smart enough to see that in order to survive for more than a year it has to happen world wide.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 16:57

>>46
Haha, l2anarchy

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 17:01

>>47
Haha, u tk hm 2 da bar|?
idk my bff jill
gtfo nigger

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 17:08

>>48
Haha, l2anarchy.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 17:12

>>49
gtfo nigger

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 17:14

>>50
Haha, l2anarchy.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 17:18

>>51
gtfo nigger

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 17:24

>>52
Haha, l2anarchy.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 17:32

>>53
gtfo nigger

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 17:41

>>54
Haha, l2anarchy

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 17:49

>>55
gtfo nigger

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 17:52

>>56
Haha, l2anarchy

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 18:23

>>57
gtfo nigger

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 18:25

>>58
Haha, l2anarchy

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 18:38

>>59
gtfo nigger

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 19:35

>>60
Haha, l2anarchy

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 20:01

>>61
gtfo nigger

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 20:06

>>62
Haha, l2anarchy

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 21:16

graet thred

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 22:20

I hear they tried this "anarchy" stuff in Somalia.

How's that working out for them?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-07 23:04

>>65
I hear they tried this "limited government" stuff in America.

How's that working out for them?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-08 2:17

>>63
gtfo nigger

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-08 8:56

>>66
Worked pretty damn good considering we're the envy of the world.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-08 15:59

>>68
Except it's no longer a limited government by any means and we're seeing huge stagnation because of it. We'll see how much longer we are the "envy" of the world.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-08 18:49

>>69
But I thought gigantic gov't like socialist Europe has was the model to follow, according to the democrats...

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-08 20:19

>>70
So we're not the envy of the world?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-09 10:10

>>71
No, we are the envy of the world, just not liked by our own democrats..

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-09 12:59

Anarchy is neither desirable or possible.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-09 15:46

USA the envy of the world still? what a bunch of bullshit. The whole world hates us. Mother fucking republicunts gtfo.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-09 17:31

>>74
NO U

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-09 21:02

>>73
nor

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-10 16:38

I'd like to be an Anarchist, but Jorge's mom won't let me.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-11 13:19

>>77
 lol

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-13 11:40

>>1
Burn rubbish bins, paint unintelligible idiocies on people's walls, do drugs.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-16 13:20

>>67
Haha, l2anarchy

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List