>>109 here
>>111 does not = me o_O', neither is
>>114 or
>>113
So you want to achieve this
>A public company is providing a service for the public, by the public, through the public.
to achieve this
>remove greed... change what its final goal is, instead of money, recognition, and a better quality of service.
So presumably you want to replace shareholders and the board of directors and CEO with the bureaucracy of a representative government. That's nationalisation. I don't want to put words in your mouth but you're not being specific... History has shown that nationalisation is only better where the service would end up as a monopoly under the private sector.
"If it was public, it would be constantly monitored and would be discovered as it started."
Who? Everyone? It will all be monitored all the time? Every e-mail has to be made public? Every audit?
>>112
"Marx's ideals are correct"
If we ever create a super duper happy utopia like in star trek we'll be dead. We need the state and property law at the moment because as evil as a monopoly over violence can be it's always more desirable than a patchwork of warlords and as little property some people can find themselves with it's better than the use of that home being at the mercy of whoever decides what is best for "the community".