Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

The True Nature of the Democrats (Socialist)

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 16:35

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 16:36

LOL LOOK AT THAT STUPID BITCH STUMBLE ALL OVER HERSELF TRYING TO MAKE HERSELF LOOK BETTER! OWNED.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 16:43

Wow, I didn't think anyone would just come out and say it.
Funny how it was a black woman who dropped the ball.

Name: Libertaryan 2008-06-05 18:31

OH MAN, I KNEW IT!!! A YOUTUBE VIDEO TO PROOV MY RETARDED DELUSIONS!! WHAT? DEFINITION OF SOCIALISM? WHO CARES, I'M LIBERTAYAN! ANYTHING WIT STAYT IZ SOOSHALIST! LIEK BUSH, WHO ISN'T A NORMAL SOSHALIST, BUT A LEFT-WING SOOSHALIST!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 19:10

>>4
Who the fuck pronounces it "socialist"? I've never heard it said that way in my life.  Stfu thx.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 19:11

>>5
I am >>5 btw.  I meant to say who the fuck pronounces it "sooshalist"?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 19:13

>>6
Libertarians

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 21:15

If by democrats you mean socialist workers party, then yes.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 21:18

>>7
I've never met anyone who pronounces it that way, let alone a libertarian.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-06 8:43

>>9
When you're crying and howling during the pronunciation, it has such an effect, and libertarians always cry about DEM SOSHALISTS

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-06 13:10

>>10
No libertarian I've met in person has ever complained about "dem soshalists" - they certainly didn't pronounce things that way, and I attend party meetings.  Gtfo faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-06 16:20

>>5
>>6
>>9
>>11
Protip: If you write less than the troll or use copypasta, you are succeeding in counter-trolling them. I myself have gotten this particular troll to waste countless hours posting the same shit over and over for just a few seconds of posting, it's sad but funny.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-06 19:49

>>11
>I attend to party meetings
HAHAHAHAHAHAH

But clearly, you are a group who is crying "Bush is socialist". I'm sorry, but the sooner you face facts the sooner you'll come to peace with them.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-06 19:53

>>12
And for you, my retarded friend, for your mind facts and truth might be BAWW TROLLAN, but they are facts. Keep crying in denial, and of course, your "counter-trolling", simply exposes how much you were hurt by the exposure of your retardation.

No amount of repeating the same delusions will change the truth.

Also, it doesn't take much to disprove your retarded delusions, because, as I said, they are so fucking obviously retarded. And, do you think copy-pasting the same stuff was any different than your other "arguments"? Sorry, but all libertarian crying is repeating the same crap, so it didn't really make a difference for me, but nice to see you acknowledging the fact that all your thought is just repeating the same bullshit!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-06 22:58

>>14
You could have spent all that time you used on that text to make an argument instead, but you didn't and wrote a load of trash instead. I think I've come to a conclusion here...

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-06 23:04

>>15
Argument to what? All that needed to be said was said, and you couldn't respond, instead you denied and cried, and a reply was posted to help you with your scheme of denial, why cry about that too? You're full of contradictions, my retarded friend, and I'm not even talking about the hilarious LIBERALS/DEMOCRATS/BUSH/ANYONE BUT ME IS SOCIALIST stuff.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 0:26

MARKIT FORSAZ WILL FIX ALL DA STAYT KROOONYIZM AND SOOOSHALIZM! LIBERTARYNIZM PREZERVS FREEDUM!!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 0:29

>>17
You couldn't resist, could you, faggot.
You were so close to saying something different but your lack of debate skills overtook you, didn't they?
Get some professional help.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 7:51

>>18
Actually, my reply was >>16, which neither you nor your retarded bretheren could answer, but then you copy-pasted that yourself or another retarded libertarian friend of yours did it in the same instance, and then you cried.

The sad thing is, of course, you retards actually believe that yet keep crying. But you wouldn't believe in magic market forces making everything alright if you could see the irony...

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 8:33

>>19
Yeah, right.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 8:50

>>20
Yeah, bush is left-wing socialist amirite?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 8:57

>>21
Do you know what the difference is between Republicans and Democrats?
Creeping socialism as opposed to rampant socialism.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 9:41

>>22
Do you know what socialism is? Clearly not.

Socialist Workers Party => Socialist
Republicans => NOT SOCIALIST
Cuban Communist Party => Socialist
Democrats => NOT SOCIALIST

But, then again, you could always cry in denial ignoring the facts.

Name: Libertaryan 2008-06-07 9:48

>>23
Silly, facts aren't for libertaryans. ANYONE WHO ISN'T A FREE-MARKET FUNDEMENTALIST IS A SOCIALIST! AND WHAT SOCIALISM IS DOESN'T MATTER AT ALL!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 10:47

>>23,24
LOL
Socialism is a very easy concept to grasp.
Unless you have some secret definition of it that no one else knows about, I think it's safe to say that other people can understand it.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 10:49

>>23,34
Even the title of thread is "The True NATURE of the Democrats."
But, I guess that went over your head.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 11:09

>>23
Actually none of them are 100% socialist, so none of them are socialist.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 14:48

>>27
1% statist
99% free-market fundamentalist

BAWWWWWW SOSHALIST

but hey, statism isn't even socialis-ok, I'll leave you to cry

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 14:49

>>25
>>26
If it is very easy, why can't you, my retarded friend? The definitions are very clear and it is clear that democrats aren't doing anything socialist, and crying BUT THEY'RE SECRETLY SOOSHALIISZT THEY'RE HIDING PROOF unfortunately isn't a valid argument. Anyways, back to youtube.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 16:49

>>29
I believe a thread was posted a little while ago that had Congresswoman Maxine Waters saying she wanted to socialize the oil industry.

I guess that's not proof, huh?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 16:58

>>28
I lied in order to procure a statement from you which proves pointing out that a system of government is 1% socialist is not the same as calling it socialist.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 18:04

>>30
Firstly, you're the retard confusing statism with socialism, so you lose from moment zero. Secondly, deeds done, retarded loser. What "socialist thing" have they done" (Of course, when you're a moron denying reality to the degree you are screaming BUSH IS SOCIALIST, then everything should be socialist to a retard of your grade)

>>31
You lied in order to prove yourself retarded once more. Congratulations on your fallacious way of thinking. Statism isn't socialism and won't be no matter how much you want to cry about it. Remember that you are the original retard who made the statement BUSH IZ LEFT-WING SOSHALIST.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 19:32

>>32
I didn't say bush was a socialist.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 19:42

>>34
Oh, so this
http://dis.4chan.org/read/newpol/1180954230/832

was another completely retarded libertarian? Get out.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 5:42

Bush is a moderate right-wing socialist

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 6:28

>>35
You do realise that is another thread, don't you?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 8:56

>>37
You do realize that it's the same retarded faggot, don't you?

>>36
I can't decide on which one sounds more retarded, right-wing socialist or left-wing socialist.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 16:53

>>35
I'm not >>832, but I can see you took what he said out of context.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 19:10

>>36
I lolled
You retard fuck, in no way is Bush socialist, omfg

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List