Question

Why is a genetic cause for faggotry considered 'politically correct'?

I mean, everything else is considered malleable by those simple minded fools, except homosexuality?

>>1,2
It's because they wouldn't be completely wrong on every matter otherwise, as a *gay gene* could not have evolved due to, essentially, the fact that gay people have so few children.
As for a real reason why it is politically correct? Knee-jerk rebuke to Christianity would be my bet.

PSEUDOSCIENCE TIEM!!!

The Y chromosone only provides information for the growth of a penis, the differences in the development of the brain between a man and a woman is due to hormones in the womb. Lesbians are essentially men in a woman's body and gays are essentially women in men's bodies. Hormones after birth do not affect sexuality, but do make gays more sexually aggressive than women and lesbians less sexually aggressive than usual men.

>>3
That's a bit like saying that cancer can't be genetic because people with cancer die.

>>6
Well, cancers are caused a tad differently (most of them being sporadic anyway), so it's sort of like comparing apples and oranges. Anyway, read this if you want: http://zero.poynt.zero.googlepages.com/home

>>6
>>7
Quit crying whinebitches, the answer has already been posted here >>5.

>>8
Well, his asinine speculation doesn't help answering the initial question -- Why is it considered politically correct?

The answer is obvious.
If homo's have to admit there is no genetic pre-disposition for their faggotry then they have to admit it's a choice.
Making a choice puts RESPONSIBILITY on someone for their actions and a liberal faggot doesn't to be responsible for his reckless behavior.

SELF-CONTRADICT MOAR

>>5
doesn't udnerstand that gender is a social construct

>>12
Your mom is a social construct.

>>9
The question was loaded, more so if the cause of homosexuality is not definite. If you want to call it speculation then you can take that up with the scientific community.
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7440
As for retarded libfags like >>12, >>10 is correct but ironically neither side of the argument is correct.

>>10 is right about the motivation for libfags like >>12, but ironically neither side of the argument has an idea about what causes homosexuality.