Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

should tobacco be banned

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-24 14:12

i say yes

benefits:
less healthcare costs
higher productivity (no smoke breaks)
more farm land will be used to produce useful products (food, bio-fuels)
cleaner environment
less house and forest fires
less car accidents

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 14:02

>>38
Prove it has no substance by stripping it apart and pointing out the contradictions.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 18:28

>>41
Again we see the retard-grade logic of an average libertarian. If i]you[/i] are making preposterous claims, you have to prove it. But, yet again we see the classical 2+2=5 PROOV ME RONG!!!! crying of the pathetically retarded organism known for crying BUSH IZ SOOSHALIST!!!!. So, come back when you can "prove" your claims with something other than MARKAT FORSAZ MAEK TINGS ALRIGHT WIT MAGIC!. What you said has no substance precisely because of it - it doesn't rely to any fact, other than your delusional mind, which was proven to be retarded again and again.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 18:28

>>42
in b4 ownage by bbcode

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 19:59

>>42
"Sooshalist"? What the fuck?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 20:27

>>44
Libertarians can't say socialist without crying, hence the pronunciation.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 21:19

>>45
I can't listen to you say "sooshalist" without crying because you sound like such a whiny little faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-06 8:42

>>46
You aren't getting this, are you?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-06 13:23

>>1
these facts have convinced me, tobacco must be banned

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-06 13:36

>>47
I've never met a libertarian who I've ever seen crying (assuming you mean this literally?)  So what is the point of what you are saying? That you're an annoying little shit? STfu unless you have something substantive to say.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-06 19:58

>>49
The fact that you assumed it to be literary says something about your intelligence, and that says something about your ideology.

How is libertarianism treating you? And how is screaming how everything, even George Fucking Bush, is socialist despite the very clear definitions and common sense contradicting these retarded statements not crying in denial?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 19:36

>>50
Bush justifies statism in the name of the people and technically this is socialism.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 19:49

>>51
Yep, repeating retarded delusions makes them right. Statism is socialism, riiiight.

Name: Libertaryan 2008-06-07 21:33

>>52
LOLNO SOCIALISM ISN'T STATISM IT'S UHH... STATISM WHEN YOU SAY YOU'RE DOING IT FOR THE PEOPAL! IF YOU SAY YOU'RE DOING IT AT THE EXPENSE OF PEOPLE IT'S NOT SOSHALIST! WHAT PEOPLE DO AND DEFINITIONS DON'T MATTER TO LIBERTARYANS! IF IT IS GOING TO FIT OUR DELUSIONS, WE CONSIDER RHETORIC AS IDEOLOGY! TO HELL WITH REALITY AND KNOWLEDGE! BUSH IZ SOSHALIST! MAN IT'S AWESOME TO HAVE A BIFURCATED MIND FILLED WITH BULLSHIT!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-08 2:18

>>52
>>53
Bush's inauguration speech proves that he believes his policies are for the people.
http://www.atthewell.com/speech/

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-08 6:58

>>36
y halo thar stoner fag. If beer goes you won't have anymore of that happy juice when you get the munchies drugfag.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-08 7:47

>>54
It would be a little bit less retarded if >>53 hadn't been posted.

So, if you openly say your policies are at the expense of people, you are capitalist?

My retarded friend, your attempts have reached a new high on patheticness. Of course he's going to say it's for the people, retarded loser - has he done anything socialist? No.

In b4 the retarded loser repeats BAWW SOSHALIZM IS STAYTIZM BAWW DEY SAY ITS FOR PEOPAL BAWWW

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-08 14:42

>>56
He says his policies are for the people, not at the expense of the people.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-08 15:23

>>57

How retarded are you? Is someone going to tell his policies are at the expense of the voters when he wants their votes? Your dumbness really knows no fucking bounds.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-09 9:33

>>58
Fidel Castro lied about wanting to create a socialist utopia in order to set up a dictatorship. What makes him a socialist?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-09 9:43

>>59
His setting up a dictatorship, obviously.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-09 9:55

>>59
Cuba has a planned economy since the rise of Castro.
If that's not socialist for you then you should learn more about Marxism.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-09 12:17

>>59
Is there a bourgeois in Cuba? Learn definitions instead of keeping up with your scheme of perpetual denial.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-09 12:43

ITT: We are three and we think what people say matters regardless of their actions, and everyone who says they're doing things for the benefit of people are communists, and no other definition or facts matter to us.

Wait, I was way smarter than that when I was three...

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-10 22:18

>>62
Is there a bourgeois in Cuba?
Yes.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-10 22:19

>>64
Oh, so there are individual people owning the means of production for profit as a class, or you are a retard who doesn't know the definition of what we are talking about.

Hmm... I wonder which one, yet again...

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 4:38

>>65
Fidel Castro is unofficially bourgeoisie.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 5:45

if you ban smoking then we need to ban video games and being fat, also posting on message boards -you should be getting fit, serving the masterplan and working to keep those lucky elite enjoying all the luxury they're accustomed too. 

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 8:55

>>66
So, he's individually a class, rriight.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 15:05

>>67
>ban being fat
maybe then America will be a less obnoxious place to see...

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 21:18

>>68
Him and his cronies are the upper class of Cuba.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 21:47

>>70
Aaand we return to >>65, even if your crying was factual, upper class is not necessarily bourgeois, whose definition you are oblivious to, dear retarded loser. Therefore, we conclude this yet again with your whining owned with facts.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-13 12:07

moar liek boregouis

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-13 12:27

>>71
Well he inhabits the same place in society as the bourgeoisie so I fail to see why you enjoy sucking his dick.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-13 19:32

>>73
No, it isn't the same place - is aristocracy and bourgeoisie the same too in your tiny mind too? You just need to accept when you are factually owned, you were wrong once, and trying to save that you exposed your ignorance on a dozen more subjects...

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-13 20:44

>>40
Fact: your posts contain no actual arguments OR facts. Especially that one.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-13 22:22

>>75
Fact: Post-ownage, you've now resorted to that retarded post to drag the "argument" further, which you seem to be doing because it takes your mind away from your aching butt. Learn to read, rather than engage in arbitrary crying perpetually - by now you should've learned that they don't fare well against facts and logic.

Learn to read, seriously, it's a useful skill.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-14 2:18

>>74
>>76
You do realise at this point you've written way more than the people you're trying to troll? You're not a very good troll. The ultimate troll is a 1 sentence proclamation that causes 100s of people to write tomes and tomes of volumes of text attempting to disprove it. Whoever said "there is a god" is the biggest troll evar.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-14 2:30

replace them with weed feilds

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-14 2:34

>>77
You do realize that facts aren't trolling, and the fact that you posted that reply actually implies that you are a party in this reality vs. DERP DERP BUSH IS SOCIALIST etc. charade

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-16 11:00

ok
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -