>>78
"your behavior hasn't really even presented a logical point of view or argument that isn't rooted in the desperate need to obtusificate my statement"
There is no basis for this, you did not specify the statement I am desperate to "obtusificate", whatever that means.
A semantical argument is a discussion about the meaning of a word. All I'm trying to do is
use the 2 meanings of the word because they are valid and relevant.
I am pretty sure that the French revolution resulted in a reign of terror followed by a dicatorship that ended with the napoleonic wars, slavery didn't end even 8 decades after the American revolution and Stalin's dictatorship did not result in a communist utopia. But I guess they are just my opinion, so what's yours?