Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Recession Worries Giving Boost to Democrats

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-01 0:43

If you want Dems to win, pray for Recession

http://www.cnbc.com/id/24392731

Name: RedCream 2008-05-01 6:27

Why pray for it?  Firstly, there's no divinity there to receive your prayer.  Secondly, we're in a Recession right now.  The outrageous and criminal use of credit at all levels has hidden the Recession.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-01 9:09

Last quarter growth results released yesterday (4-31-08).
Growth was a meager .6%
Notice I said GROWTH.
What is the definition of a recession, Professor RedCream?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-01 10:25

Oh for fuck's sake.

Is anybody else here old enough to remember the 90s?  American jobs were being shipped to the Third World at a dizzying pace, foreclosures and personal bankruptcies were setting all-time records, but the talking heads on the jewtube were all saying:

"Gee, the stock market is at 8000, we have 6% unemployment.  That's full employment!  Isn't the economy wonderful?  It's all because of Klinton and NAFTA!  WE LOVE KLINTON!  Everybody loves Klinton so much that he could be fucking babies and NO ONE WOULD CARE, and if you disagree you're a RIGHT-WING KOOK and you should SHUT THE FUCK UP because the ECONOMY is SO WONDERFUL!"

Fast-forward ten years.  The stock market is at 13,000 and unemplyment is at 5%, but the talking heads on the jewtube all say "BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW, it's a RECESSION!  It's Bush's fault!  BUSH'S FAULT!  WE HATE BUSH AND YOU SHOULD TOO!"

You pathetic little marionettes really don't see the strings, do you?  "The bread ration was INCREASED from four loaves a month to two loaves a month.  WE LOVE BIG BROTHER!"

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-01 12:33

>>4
lol

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-01 12:42

>>4
Nice try at shitty apologetics without any substance.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-01 23:47

>>6
Nice try at a response that doesn't address any of the points.  Now what, motherfucker?

Name: RedCream 2008-05-01 23:50

>>3
That "growth" was only made possible by unprecedented levels of debt in three sectors:  corporate, personal and government.  When you consider the Great Credit Crash that we must face due to all that debt that CAN'T be repaid, that 0.6% is easily wiped out.

The thing is -- and sit up straight in my fucking classroom, you hippie freak! -- that we are in an UNPRECEDENTED ERA.  Even the 1920s saw people with enough self-capitalization and -feeding capacity to weather the Capital Storm that the bankers designed back then.  Today, DEBT overshadows all considerations.  There's just no term for it.  There's just no term for it in the great equation of Recession.  You may as well ask about economic figures while a civil war is going on; war is just NOT DEFINED in the calculations of periodic commerce.  Being undefined, the results have to be rejected as TRASH during the time when the undefined event is affecting the results.

Now read a few more books before you prance back in here thinking you've got me sussed.  Hippie.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-02 4:44

>>7
Crying about an imaginary future you made up in your illiterate mind with no basis at all is having a point now? Wow, some of you retards are even stupider than I thought.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-02 9:14

>>8
You know, I think your right.
Definitions mean nothing when you can just make up a reason to refute it.
Let me try: The Great Depression never really occured. There was unprecedented growth in certain sectors of the economy during that period, so it actually nullifies the negative growth.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-02 10:46

God damn Great Depression deniers.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-02 12:37

>>10
Disregard that, there is no way I could possibly imagine stupidity of this magnitude.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-02 15:10

>>12
NO U

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-02 20:59

>>9 Crying about an imaginary future you made up in your illiterate mind with no basis at all is having a point now? Wow, some of you retards are even stupider than I thought.

...so you concede my point, then, so all you have by way of response is namecalling and "no u?"

Pathetic.

Name: AnOnYmOuS 2U 2008-05-02 21:30

OMG! RedCream has a point, but a moot and poinient one at that. First, he wants us to BELIEVE him when he won't believe us...hmm.
Second, he does make the point about us being in a farely large recession, but due to what? And hidden by what?
Oh wait...I'm not supposed to ask questions, I'm just supposed to shut up and agree and conform to the likes of whomever's biggest ego. Naw thank you.

I have a guess that the revelation of recession effects, inflation, and 1913 when congress passed the 16th amendment pressured by the very bankers that structured the Federal Reserve and Federal Income Tax racquet...racquetteering..hmm,  has to do with overwhelming our attention via the war on terror and biological threats that were propagated by government informants by releasing said counter-intelligence to the people of the United States who still had a heavy debt of paying off the national deficit which is...inflation...Oh that's right, I forgot again, our government wouldn't lie to us, it's made up of fellow humans, right? "To err is human" Yeah, I believe people at there word when it comes to them, but when it comes to me, I stand my ground.

Take the word "Stupid(er)" for instance. The fact that your post reveals this word, >>14, exemplifies the very statement you portray. So, take that! -> -_-, <- crybaby. And what does that first statement actually state? Oh I know, "Blah, Blah, Blah, I've got stupid bitch syndrome written into my very statements! Believe in ME!!!!!" Sorry, I only believe that you are have stupid bitch syndrome written into your statements which I refuse to buy even for free just $9.95 S/H.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-02 21:30

>>14
I know you are but what am I?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-03 6:09

>>14
IN THE FUTURE KONSERVAFAGS WILL RULE AND IT WILL BE HORRIBLE IT WILL BE HELL, BAWWW LIEK 1984

Look, an "argument" which has the same amount of intelligence and truth as your piece which you made up. Enjoy being so pathetically retarded that you can't even differentiate truth from things you made up a second ago.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-03 6:17

>>6
>>14
Clinton era: DOW jones is at 8000, 6% unemployment
Bush era: DOW jones is up to 13000, unemployment down to 5%
What do you think of these facts? Has Bush ruined the economy?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-03 6:25

>>18
Wow, this is a new one. Generally retards argue that Bush's failure was due to other factors Clinton didn't have to worry about, but claiming Bush is better by citing two isolated statistics? Brilliant.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-03 7:16

>>19
BECAUSE THE US DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DOESN'T AGREE WITH YOU IT'S ALL PART OF A CONSPIRACY BY EVIL CAPITALISTS TO PUT YOU DOWN AMIRITE?

http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet

YOU RETARDED FUCK UP!

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-03 7:18

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-03 8:39

>>20
facepalm.png

enjoy your perpetual denial

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-03 8:47

http://www.ppionline.org/ppi_ci.cfm?knlgAreaID=127&subsecid=177&contentid=252964


BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWW OVERALL RESULTS ARE IRRELEVANT BAAAWWW MY PATHETIC BRAIN HAS ONLY THE CAPACITY TO DEAL WITH ONE SINGLE STATISTIC, WHICH HAPPENS TO COINCIDE WITH MY BUTTHURT DELUSIONS FORMED BY MY RETARDATION AND IGNORANCE

PROTIP: Next time, don't cry about how Bush is better than Clinton, say that Bush could've been better if not for the factors that weren't under his control that caused recession, or some other form of retarded apologetics, I don't know this is the field where you pathetic morons excel at.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-03 16:02

>>23 BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW UNEMPLOYMENT IS NOW LOWER THAN IT WAS TEN YEARS AGO AND THE STOCK MARKET IS HIGHER BUT I WANT TO CLING TO MY COMFORTING BELIEF THAT THERE IS A "RECESSION" SO I WILL PULL SOME MADE-UP SHIT OUT OF MY ASS, BAWWWWWWWWWWWWW I HATE BUSH AND YOU SHOULD TOO!

Yawn.  Is that all you've got?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-03 17:07

>>19

January 2000 Stats:

Dow: 11700
Unemployment: 4%

May 2008:

Dow:13000
Unemployment: 5%
Dow in 2000 dollars assuming 2.5% annual inflation each year: 10600

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-03 17:26

>>24
I love it when you retards deny all common sense and logic just to conform your spoon-fed delusions.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-03 18:19

>>26
Well, I love it when you spoon feeders try to deny the logic that conforms to your delusional retardation.


so there!

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-03 19:58

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAi don't actually have an argument I just like to BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-03 20:01

Overall the statistics have not changed that much.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-03 20:06

>>28
It is nice to see you admitting your failure. I hope you will act less retarded in the future.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-03 22:26

>>30
Who are you and who do you think you are talking to?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-04 6:07

>>31
no u, etc.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-04 10:27

>>32
what

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-04 10:31

As a student of the WORD, more specifically PROPHECY, (this is where i take the time to remind my Christian Brothers- "We are COMMANDED to COVET PROPHECY"- one of the two most-lossed references our LORD makes).
Having said that; look my family- i know a lot of what i have said, or what i will still yet say- offends many, but i won't repent of the WORD, (i just won't do-it, if it offends- it should).
(i) have found (so far)- that ALL the LORD'S PROPHECIES, share some common traits:
(1) NONE are "mystical prognostications". Since the LORD built R-E-A-L-I-T-Y, from the back to the fore, (we have won the victory)- all prophecies from God, are a matter of HISTORY, (from Papa's perspective)- ERGO: they MUST transpire EXACTLY as stated.
(2) ALL prophecies of God transpire LITERALLY.
(3) SOME prophecies of God transpire in the SPIRITUAL, aswell as the PHYSICAL
(4) SOME prophecies of God, transpire MORE THAN ONCE.

Having said that, the "WOMAN" in Revelation, that sits "DRUNKEN" with the "BLOOD" of the "SAINTS"- is a "WHORE".
WOMAN = CHURCH, (or POTENTIAL BELIEVERS) that left thier FIRST-LOVE, (CHRIST) for OTHER GODS, (idolized lifestyles, sin in general)-ergo; a WHORE sits..
"DRUNKEN" is a reference to ACTIONS, (ie; a drunk speaks/acts as though he is beyond reprisal for his actions)-
"BLOOD", is a reference to abortion, it is also SPIRITUAL reference to those who once were Born Again, back-sliding by, or from example-
Having said that:
the woman, (i believe- and NOT- "thus sayeth the Lord")- is also a PHYSICAL reference to who is in power, (either in WASHINGTON,D.C.- or NYC- via United Nations)-
NOW, and only NOW in history, has there been an opprotunity for not just one woman- but (3) THREE women, to be alotted potentially to be President of this nation, (or soon- President of the United Nations).
Like any other MAN, i love WOMEN, so don't get all bunchy, i'm just saying, that everything i've just listed is TRUE, (doesn't matter what (i) think, about "boo").
Having said that: if we can get Ron Paul, into the Presidency- we buy a few-more years...Only all the Jewish people in Israel, can bring the Messiah back sooner- failing-that- please consider prayer.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-04 10:52

>>33
just keep crying

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-04 13:28

>>34
wat

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List