fail vs. fail

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7297390.stm

This caught my eye just now. Islamofags who are trying to convert a secular country to shariahole is bad, but banning a party who got 47% of the votes too is bad. I'm not sure which side is right (or, "more right", I should say) in a situation like this, so I thought I should ask /newpol/, and considering the average intelligence here, the opposite of what you think should be the right one.

>>10
I didn't mean to imply that either party was ideal, just to note that the poor in Turkey got an extremely bad deal from the type of society built by Kemalist elements in the Turkish middle class and ruling elite. Appeals to alternatives, even if extremely undesirable from an outsider perspective, have to be looked at in terms of what they're replacing. A political culture which is so polarised can only lead to trouble, and it's important to mention how, in the past, spectacular efforts have been made to inforce the special sort of fundamentalist secularism that exists there, against the will of the majority of the population.