>>24
Again, you aren't getting the extremely simple premise. I'm not going to give a flying fuck about your shitty rights if I'm more powerful than the god damn state. I said the fallacy of libertarianism was its name, and that addressed the social issues. No one is going to be liberated that way, and anyone who understands how free market works, from me to Adam fucking Smith knows this.
But yeah, at least you didn't pretend to know shit about economics unlike other retarded libertarians who repeated the same spoon-fed fallacious arguments, I have to give that to you. So I suggest you to get some knowledge on the subject of macroeconomics if you are serious about it, and then re-consider whether libertarianism would result in more freedom for the masses. You cannot have an opinion without having knowledge, the rest is idle talk.