Hello libfags

So suppose the hereditarian hypothesis of the IQ gap is conclusively proven (though I don't really understand how it's not atm), and that Blacks will be, on average, dumber for the the foreseeable future.
My question to libfags is this. If it happens, will libfags then
1) support a Rawlsian argument (claim that genetic advantages are undeserved and unfair, and thus enforce substantial and permanent racial preferences)?
2) still be in complete denial of reality?
3) understand that we don't owe them anything, never have, never will?
Thanks.

>>1
Your premise is flawed.

Social/environmental issues are the greatest determinant.  Blacks are no less intelligent than poor white trash. 

If the mother is drinking/doing drugs, eating poorly, etc. while pregnant the kid will be fucked.  If the kid, once born, is fed poorly and not well educated they're fucked.

If both parents die from AIDS when the kid's young the kid's fucked.

There's less genetic variation among humans than most mammals, including dogs and chimps.

The myth of racial superiority is an artifact of the european slave trade that most people are too stupid to understand.

don't get me wrong, most "black" culture is as retarded as the culture of white trash (Springer!) and they'll never achieve equality without adopting a culture more like that of asians and other successful immigrants (value education, community, don't be a nigger, etc).