Casablanca - the documentary on the DVD shows tons of Jew producers, and the plot is about sacrifice for the Jewish cause
Hairspray - White pride is bad, interracial offspring is good
Bee Movie - A long string of obvious and tasteless Jew jokes
Schindler's List - Portrays Nazis as bad people
Name:
Anonymous2008-01-02 22:42
If the best you can do is 4 films, you should consider suicide. Really. It would be much more harder to do a list without obvious Jewish influence.
Name:
Anonymous2008-01-02 22:46
Borat - Uses satire to dodge the issue instead of taking responsibility for all the wrongs committed by Jews
>>5
I'm not that guy, but it portrays Nazis as the epitome of evil, and, subsequently, opposing people that oppose Jews the epitome of good, and thus making Jews able to free-ride through life, with no opposition NO MATTER what they do.
I also have less sympathy for the Allies than the Nazis in terms of war crimes if you actually check the track record side by side.
Name:
Anonymous2008-01-03 7:26
>>6
Ok so Jews want to demonize all Germans and Nazis but they make Oskar Shindler, a German Nazi solider, the hero of their film? What part of the Jewish conspiracy does this fit into?
Your war crime comment is too dumb to comment on.
Name:
Anonymous2008-01-03 8:21
>>7
I thought I made myself clear: opposing people that oppose Jews [being] the epitome of good
is their message. In this case, Schindler. They are setting moral standards. This is not the first time (nor the last) they're doing this.
So what's wrong with what I said?
Also, nearly every part of the film is patently false, so I agree with OP. The Jewish-tombstone paved road a Volkswagen drove over was lulzy yet vile anti-German propaganda, for example.
(You do know that Spielberg is a Jew, right?) Your war crime comment is too dumb to comment on.
Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki is a good start to research, but I don't want to get into that.
Name:
Anonymous2008-01-03 8:49
Indiana Jones - Middle Easterners are portrayed as primitive, backwards, medieval, and barbaric, but so are asians and hindus
Name:
Anonymous2008-01-03 9:28
Snakes on a Plane - Interracial relationships are mandatory just to prove how normal they are
Name:
Anonymous2008-01-03 9:47
Starship Troopers - Mandatory racial minorities inserted for no reason, there's a panning shot of them standing with an obligatory Mexican
Name:
Anonymous2008-01-03 10:27
>>8
Yup, and don't forget the atrocities the British and the Americans committed before (or even after) the Second World War.
In his book Late Victorian Holocausts, published in 2001, Mike Davis tells the story of famines that killed between 12 million and 29 million Indians. These people were, he demonstrates, murdered by British state policy. When an El Nino drought destituted the farmers of the Deccan plateau in 1876 there was a net surplus of rice and wheat in India. But the Viceroy, Lord Lytton, insisted that nothing should prevent its export to England. In 1877 and 1878, at the height of the famine, grain merchants exported a record 320,000 tonnes of wheat. As the peasants began to starve, officials were ordered "to discourage relief works in every possible way." The Anti-Charitable Contributions Act of 1877 prohibited "at the pain of imprisonment private relief donations that potentially interfered with the market fixing of grain prices." The only relief permitted in most districts was hard labour, from which anyone in an advanced state of starvation was turned away. In the labour camps, the workers were given less food than inmates of Buchenwald. In 1877, monthly mortality in the camps equated to an annual death rate of 94 per cent.
As millions died, the imperial government launched "a militarised campaign to collect the tax arrears accumulated during the drought." The money, which ruined those who might otherwise have survived, was used by Lord Lytton to fund his war in Afghanistan. Even in places that had produced a crop surplus, the government's export policies, such as Stalin's in Ukraine, manufactured hunger. In the north-western provinces, Oud, and the Punjab, which had brought in record harvests in the preceding three years, at least 1.25 million died.
And the the Kikuyu Holocaust of the 1950s:
Three recent books — Britain's Gulag by Caroline Elkins, Histories of the Hanged by David Anderson, and Web of Deceit by Mark Curtis — show how white settlers and British troops suppressed the Mau Mau revolt in Kenya in the 1950s. Thrown off their best land and deprived of political rights, the Kikuyu started to organise — some of them violently — against colonial rule. The British responded by driving up to 320,000 of them into concentration camps. Most of the remainder — more than a million — were held in "enclosed villages." Prisoners were questioned with the help of "slicing off ears, boring holes in eardrums, flogging until death, pouring paraffin over suspects who were then set alight, and burning eardrums with lit cigarettes." The soldiers were told they could shoot anyone they liked "provided they were black." Ms. Elkins' evidence suggests that more than 100,000 Kikuyu were either killed or died of disease and starvation in the camps. David Anderson documents the hanging of 1,090 suspected rebels: far more than the French executed in Algeria. Thousands more were summarily executed by soldiers, who claimed they had "failed to halt" when challenged.
And there are even more examples of British atrocities, such as the Tasmanian genocide.
And why don't we know of these things?
Well, the British are one of the "good guys", after all...
Name:
Anonymous2008-01-03 12:44
>>12
How can you compare the muder of 6 million innocent civilians in death labor camps to, at most, 100,000 Kenyan soldiers who were fighting against democracy?
For the other stuff you are having to go back to the mid 19th century... Next are you going to tell me that Brits used to enslave blacks?
The "historians" you cite are very, very far left and totally baised. Do a search and you will find they have little credibility and are accused of grossly exaggerating death tolls.
Name:
Anonymous2008-01-03 14:03
OP here. A quick summary:
Whenever there's at least one Jew involved in the production of a film it means the film is laced with subliminal messages (in fact so subliminal you don't see them unless you’re looking for proof of a Zionist conspiracy theory). Remember that every movie has these messages -- you just have to watch them through your “special lens”. Note, however, that no amount of logic or rational thought will make you see through such a lens. One can only see the truth after having achieved 2000 posts on Stormfront.org or by having read “Mein Kampf”, “My Awakening” or other selected works.
Once you are able to see things clearly through your lens, you must realize that any political message you don't like (anything that doesn’t conform to Nazi ideology) was placed there by the Jews to subvert public opinion in favor of the Zionist cause and to exterminate the White race. Now that you are equipped with the truth, it is your duty to spread the word so we can conquer the Zionist oppressor.
It has nothing to do with that. It's whether or not I like the movie. Serving Sarah was a terrible movie, so it was made by Jews. IQ was a terrible movie, so it was made by Jews. And of course Scary Movie 4, Date Movie, and Epic Movie. More often than not, bad comedies are made by Jews.
Name:
Anonymous2008-01-04 21:17
How come Jews put black people in movies but not asians or hispanics?
Name:
Anonymous2008-01-04 21:39
Asians and Hispanics are usually the "worthless" races who die meaningless deaths, like the Mexican in Lost World Jurassic Park or any asian that gets shot for no reason in a convenience store or taxi. Asians are usually cast regardless of their nationality, which is type of joke that means "All of them look alike," and with a more stereotypical accent, "All of them sound alike." Typically the Asian is meant to be contrasted with the white main character, just to show that Asians are different. Mexicans are shown as one step away from blacks, as they are involved in gangs, drugs, etc.
Black people, as a rule, get "first death" status as any black character will be the first to die (Transformers, 3000 miles to Graceland, etc), but this is only a way for the film producers to say "We own you" to the black community. When blacks are not killed, they are given white jobs and paired with a white love interest to promote interracial breeding. This is more important than breeding with Mexicans or Asians as it produces desired results quickly.
Name:
Anonymous2008-01-05 2:04
All the President's Men (1976)
Name:
Anonymous2008-01-05 9:57
>>15
I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry was made by Jews, too
"The Pursuit of Happyness" has Will Smith solving a Rubik's Cube in a few minutes just to show how smart he is, but the actual person the story was based on says that never happened. Black guys just have to be smart in movies.
Celtic Pride
The Cable Guy
Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy
Kicking & Screaming
The 40 Year-Old Virgin
Fun with Dick and Jane
Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby
Knocked Up
Superbad
Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story
He has at least ten more comedies lined up for the future. This is the face of the Hollywood Jew Machine.
Creator/producer of popular boy bands Backstreet Boys and 'N Sync. He is now being held on charges of running one of the biggest Ponzi schemes in United States history. He was arrested in Indonesia in June 2007.
This is what happens when Jews run the music industry
Name:
Anonymous2008-01-09 16:24
Seinfeld: Jew
Ross (David Schwimmer): Jew
Adam Sandler: Jew
Lorne Michaels: Jew
Guess who gets to be a comedian, get recurring roles in comedies, produce writer and direct comedies? If you aren't a Jew, you can at least get hired by one.
Meet the Spartans is a 2008 spoof/parody produced and directed by Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer. Despite the negative critical reaction, the film opened in top spot at the US box office, grossing $18,505,530 over its opening weekend, narrowly edging out fellow newcomer Rambo, following the success of Epic Movie which debuted at #1 at the box office with a gross of $18.6 million over the opening weekend, and grossing $86.8 million with $39,739,367 of that amount earned domestically, making the film another financial success. Both films are used to finance the pricey cocaine habit both filmmakers have, explaining much of the tone and pacing in both movies. Friedberg and Seltzer happen to be Jewish, getting first dibs on any aspect of the "satire" genre before it can be tried by talented non-Jewish writers who lack Hollywood connections.