Doun't vout foor Raan Pool (Ron Paul)

If Raan Pool bikams President:
If Ron Paul becomes President:

- Thö end of eni chääns of nääshonol helthkeör
- The end of any chance of national healthcare
- Thö dissoliushon of thö Federol Risöörv resalts in maltipl, kampiiting körensiis, rendöring intersteit kamers niörli impasibl.
- The dissolution of the Federal Reserve results in multiple, competing currencies, rendering interstate commerce nearly impossible.
- Kanstituushonol ämendments bäning aborshon end gei märich.
- Constitutional amendments banning abortion and gay marriage.

I'm not a gringo, so I don't vote in your stupid elections. Even if I were, why would I care? It's "democracy". Remember?

It doesn't matter who gets elected. It's all the same. Same system. Same level of people. Same method by which they become candidates. Democracy is a lie. Stick democracy up your ass.

>>1
Ha ha!  FOOL.

#1:  There's the same chance of national healthcare under Ron Paul as with any other candidate.  The difference is that Ron Paul doesn't support it for reasons of fiscal conservatism, whereas all the other candidates won't support it (regardless of what they say) since their insurance-industry donors won't allow a true, single-payer system.  Some of them WILL, however, allow an insurance-industry run system that will be horribly expensive and there will be no way for the individual to avoid it ... since the government will just hand the insurance industry full authority to pull premiums RIGHT OUT OF YOUR PAYCHECK.  It's government-authorized theft.

#2: The dissolution of the Federal Reserve means NO SUCH THING.  The US Congress still retains the right to issue currency.  If the Fed goes away, the US Congress will simply have some other agency print and distribute money, but in that case, will retain control in the Congress over such issuance.  There is literally NO REASON to suppose that if the Fed is dissolved, that multiple currencies will become the American norm.

#3: We already have plenty of states with constitutional bans against gay marriage.  If abortion were left to each state (as is only proper, by the US Constitution), then some states would probably outlaw it.  What, are you against states' rights or something?

>>3
States should not decide whether people have abortion or not. Individuals should decide.

>>4
States should not decide whether people can shoot other people or not. Individuals should decide.
1) There is dispute among citizens if abortion is murder.
2) I don't see anything wrong with people who share certain views clustering in a location.
3) You can always decide in a different state.
I personally have no problem with abortion, nor am I an amerifag, but if you want to be fair, this is the best way.
As for gay marriage, I don't think marriage should be a legal process. Just as a thought experiment, if right now you had no such thing as marriage... and you "bonded" with someone ... what kind of shithead would want to INVOLVE THE GOVERNMENT IN THIS?

>>4
Also, please display where Ron Paul wants to make an amendment banning gay marriage, and why I should really care.

>>3

is an idiot

1: the reason health care is through the fucking roof right now is because the government is involved.  National healthcare is NOT something that is going to be all flowers and roses.

2: Competing currencies are not a bad thing.  They are in fact a very GOOD thing. Right now we are headed towards (and some say already in) a recession.  Some speculate a future depression, on a worldwide scale, that will make 1929 look like the ball pit at mcdonalds.  This will come about from private bankers with the power to print national currency, injecting as much money as they can to keep wallstreet's boner up.  This comes at the cost of our own boners, as the value of the dollar is decreased each and every time they inject money into the economy. Why do you think the dollar is at an all time low.  Because of shitheads in the federal reserve who think you can get out of any scrape by printing and throwing money at it.  Competing currencies, or a currency that is BACKED by something, can offer a solution to this, and potentially avert the inevitable depression that we are headed towards (in cooperation with a balanced budget).

3: He isnt for that you fucking idiot.  Have you even looked at his platform?  He thinks gays should have the same rights as straights, but that marriage shouldn't be tied to the government.  It is a RELIGIOUS institution, not something the federal, or even state governments should get their noses in.  As for abortion, the federal government shouldn't have the power to regulate it.  The end.  He is for a very limited federal government, that fulfills it's constitutional duty and no more than that.

Ron Paul, the destroyer of worlds