>>10
>>9 here.
No you weren't.
Fuck you, I *WAS*.
1) Jews write a shitty unscholarly "Holocaust" smear report against my country in order to get monies.
2) Jewish groups lobby it as official history, and lobby "Holocaust" denial laws in.
3) I write a scholarly long historical work detailing atrocities that Jews committed at the same time, which prompted several reprisals which they have overblown using official, using only official army documentation. I have not "denied" their imaginary Holocheese whose documentary evidence which involves actual killing amounts to one single order to execute several Jews in case partisans do not cease attacking my country's troops and engaging in anti-Axis activities (which wasn't even carried out by the way).
4) Apparently the only response I get to my paper is official Jew BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW and jailtime for Holocheese "denial."
Just so you won't cry like a faggot, I am not talking about Germany/Occupied Territories. Rather another country, with brand new Holo-claims.
Also rational debate requires that you disprove them on an individual basis, whining because there are a load of Jews somewhere is like those affirmative action punks who blame all their problems on white priviledge and tar all white males.
Neocon Jews all argue for the SAME thing, hence the neocon bit in the classification. This is analogous to arguing every single motherfucking Catholic smalltime churchleader against Catholicism. Grow the FUCK up.
Anyway, if you want arguments proving my views right, just read:
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/UnderstandJI-3.htm
And either write a rebuttal or shut up. In before ad hominem attacks.
It's kind of confusing to make out whether we are talking about Jews or neocon Jews, so let's be more specific.