Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 8:04
http://www.nraila.org/News/Read/NewsReleases.aspx?ID=10290
The Supreme Court is set to review a case decided by three republican federal judges that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms. Upholding the ruling would create a Supreme Court precedent that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms. This would create a precedent similar to Roe vs. Wade - but for gun owners! The courts could then use it to overturn gun control laws that prevent people from exercising their Second Amendment rights. This is yet another reason it is crucial that we get more strict constructionist judges on the Federal benches to restrain government and protect our constitutional liberties.
Will the libfag activist judges 'interpret' the Second Amendment out of the constitution, or will we emerge with a pro-liberty binding legal precedent that applies to everyone around the United States... protecting their freedom to own guns? This is what is at stake.
The Supreme Court is set to review a case decided by three republican federal judges that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms. Upholding the ruling would create a Supreme Court precedent that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms. This would create a precedent similar to Roe vs. Wade - but for gun owners! The courts could then use it to overturn gun control laws that prevent people from exercising their Second Amendment rights. This is yet another reason it is crucial that we get more strict constructionist judges on the Federal benches to restrain government and protect our constitutional liberties.
Will the libfag activist judges 'interpret' the Second Amendment out of the constitution, or will we emerge with a pro-liberty binding legal precedent that applies to everyone around the United States... protecting their freedom to own guns? This is what is at stake.